Abstract:We study the distributional implications of uncertainty shocks by developing a model that links macroeconomic aggregates to the US distribution of earnings and consumption. We find that: initially, the fraction of low-earning workers decreases, while the share of households reporting low consumption increases; at longer horizons, the fraction of low-income workers increases, but the consumption distribution reverts to its pre-shock shape. While the first phase reduces income inequality and increases consumption inequality, in the second stage income inequality rises, while the effects on consumption inequality dissipate. Finally, we introduce Functional Local Projections and show that they yield similar results.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to study the impact of uncertainty shocks on the distribution of income and consumption. Specifically, the authors develop a model that links macroeconomic aggregates to the income and consumption distributions in the United States to explore how uncertainty shocks affect people at different income levels and household consumption patterns.
### Decomposition of the core issues in the paper:
1. **Distributional effects of uncertainty shocks**:
- The authors focus on how uncertainty shocks (such as those brought about by economic policies and market fluctuations) affect income distribution and consumption patterns.
- The study finds that in the short - term, the proportion of low - income workers decreases, while the proportion of households reporting low consumption increases; in the long - term, the proportion of low - income workers increases again, but the consumption distribution returns to its pre - shock shape.
2. **Changes in income inequality and consumption inequality**:
- In the first stage (short - term), income inequality decreases, while consumption inequality increases.
- In the second stage (long - term), income inequality rises, and the impact of consumption inequality gradually disappears.
3. **Methodological innovation**:
- The authors introduce Functional Local Projections (F - LPs) and show that they obtain similar results to those obtained from the Functional Structural Vector Autoregression (F - SVAR), thus providing a new tool for analyzing the distributional effects of uncertainty shocks.
### Formula summary:
- **F - SVAR model**:
\[
y_t = c_y+\sum_{l = 1}^{p}B_{l,yy}y_{t - l}+\sum_{l = 1}^{p}\int B_{l,yf}(\tilde{x})e_{f,t - l}(\tilde{x})d\tilde{x}+u_{y,t}
\]
\[
e_{f,t}(x)=c_f(x)+\sum_{l = 1}^{p}B_{l,fy}(x)y_{t - l}+\sum_{l = 1}^{p}\int B_{l,ff}(x,\tilde{x})e_{f,t - l}(\tilde{x})d\tilde{x}+u_{f,t}(x)
\]
- **Log Quantile Density (LQD) transformation**:
\[
f_t(x)=g\{p_t(\cdot)\}=\log\left[\frac{d}{dz}Q(z)\Bigg|_{z = x}\right],\quad x\in[0,1]
\]
- **Quantile function**:
\[
Q(x)=\theta\int_0^x\exp[f_t(z)]dz
\]
where \(\theta=\sup_{\xi\in\Xi}\xi\times\left(\int_0^1\exp[f_t(z)]dz\right)^{-1}\)
Through these methods, the authors are able to more comprehensively understand the impact of uncertainty shocks on economic distribution and reveal their complex time - dynamic characteristics.