Destabilizing a Social Network Model via Intrinsic Feedback Vulnerabilities

Lane H. Rogers,Emma J. Reid,Robert A. Bridges

2024-11-17

Abstract:Social influence plays an important role in shaping individual opinions and actions, particularly in our digitally connected world. AI-generated, personalized content has led to serious and well-founded concerns, including United States Supreme Court Cases regarding the potential for the radicalization of individuals based on social influence. Motivated by these developments, we present a case study investigating the effects of small but intentional perturbations on the integrity of a simple social network. We employ Taylor's classic model of social influence and use tools from robust control theory (most notably the Dynamic Structure Function (DSF)), to identify precisely the perturbations that are sufficient to qualitatively alter the system's equilibrium and also minimal in norm. In particular, we examine two scenarios: perturbations to an existing link and perturbations taking the form of the addition of a new link to the network. In each case, we identify destabilizing perturbations and simulate their effects. Remarkably, we find that even small alterations to network structure may cause sentiments to grow in magnitude without bound, indicating the potential for large-scale shifts in collective behavior to be triggered by minor adjustments in social influence. Our findings emphasize the imperative need for further investigation into vulnerabilities in real-world social networks, where such dynamics may already exist.

Social and Information Networks,Optimization and Control,Physics and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problem does this paper attempt to solve?

This paper aims to explore the impact of small but intentional perturbations on the integrity of simple social networks. Specifically, the researchers focus on how to disrupt the stable state of the system by changing the influence between nodes in the social network (i.e., adding or modifying connections), and analyze the far - reaching impacts these perturbations may bring.

#### Background and Motivation

With the increasing popularity of AI - generated personalized content, the role of social influence in shaping individual opinions and behaviors has become more prominent. This phenomenon has raised serious social concerns, such as the case in the US Supreme Court regarding the algorithm recommendation system that may lead to individual radicalization. Based on these real - world backgrounds, the researchers proposed a case study to explore the impact of small but intentional perturbations on the stability of social networks.

#### Research Methods

1. **Model Selection**: The researchers adopted Taylor's classic social influence model, which allows the opinions of nodes (i.e., individuals) to influence each other over time and takes into account the influence of static information sources (such as mass media).

2. **Tool Application**: They used the Dynamic Structure Function (DSF) in robust control theory, which is a mathematical framework that can be used to analyze the long - term stability of a system to perturbations.

3. **Perturbation Types**:
- **Perturbations of Existing Connections**: Change the weights of existing connections.
- **Introduction of New Connections**: Introduce new connections between nodes that were not directly connected originally.

4. **Objective**: Identify the perturbation with the smallest norm that can qualitatively change the equilibrium state of the system and simulate its effect.

#### Main Findings

The study found that even small adjustments to the network structure may lead to unbounded growth of emotional values, indicating that collective behavior may undergo large - scale changes due to small changes in social influence. This emphasizes the importance of further research on similar dynamics in real - world social networks.

#### Conclusions

This study reveals that extreme social influence changes can be achieved through small perturbations, especially when the perturbations occur on the most central nodes in the network. This finding not only provides a theoretical basis for understanding the vulnerability of social networks but also reminds us that we need to conduct more in - depth analysis of actual social networks to assess their potential risks.

### Formula Representation

When describing the social network model, the researchers used the following mathematical formulas:

- **Taylor's Social Network Model**:
\[
\dot{x}=-(L + \Gamma)x+\Gamma u
\]
where \( L \) is the Laplacian matrix of the network, and \( \Gamma \) is a diagonal matrix representing the degree of influence of each node by external information sources.

- **Dynamic Structure Function (DSF)**:
\[
Y(s)=Q(s)Y(s)+P(s)U(s)
\]
where \( Q(s) \) and \( P(s) \) respectively represent the causal influence between states \( Y \) and the causal influence of input \( U \) on state \( Y \).

- **Perturbation Matrix \( \Delta(s) \)**:
\[
\Delta(s)=\begin{bmatrix}
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & \frac{1051(1 - s)^2}{1128(s + 1)^2} \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0
\end{bmatrix}
\]

These formulas show the mathematical models used in the study and the specific forms of perturbations, ensuring the correctness and readability of the formulas.