Abstract:The fragility of financial systems was starkly demonstrated in early 2023 through a cascade of major bank failures in the United States, including the second, third, and fourth largest collapses in the US history. The highly interdependent financial networks and the associated high systemic risk have been deemed the cause of the crashes. The goal of this paper is to enhance existing systemic risk analysis frameworks by incorporating essential debt valuation factors. Our results demonstrate that these additional elements substantially influence the outcomes of risk assessment. Notably, by modeling the dynamic relationship between interest rates and banks' credibility, our framework can detect potential cascading failures that standard approaches might miss. The proposed risk assessment methodology can help regulatory bodies prevent future failures, while also allowing companies to more accurately predict turmoil periods and strengthen their survivability during such events.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problems does this paper attempt to solve?
This paper aims to enhance the existing systemic - risk assessment framework by introducing crucial debt - valuation factors such as the time structure of debt, recovery rate, credit quality, and interest rate. Specifically, the author attempts to solve the following problems:
1. **Limitations of existing models**:
- Existing systemic - risk models are mainly based on structural financial models, which have the problem of insufficient flexibility when dealing with the spread of financial crises. For example, they overly simplify or ignore factors such as recovery rate, the time structure of debt, credit quality, and interest rate.
- Standard methods may not be able to detect potential cascading failures caused by the interdependence of financial networks.
2. **Improve the accuracy of risk assessment**:
- By incorporating these key factors into systemic - risk assessment, the author hopes to improve the precision and robustness of risk assessment. In particular, by modeling the dynamic relationship between interest rates and bank reputation, it is possible to more accurately predict potential cascading failures.
3. **Prevent future crises**:
- The proposed new risk - assessment method can help regulators prevent future financial - institution failures and enable companies to more accurately predict turbulent periods, thereby enhancing their viability during these events.
### Main contributions of the paper
- **Introduce Reduced - Form Models**: By integrating Reduced - Form Models into the NEVA framework, the author proposes new valuation functions to better capture debt - market dynamics.
- **Dynamic recovery mechanism**: A dynamic recovery mechanism is proposed, which enables the model to reflect changes in the recovery rate under different market conditions.
- **Interest - rate feedback model**: An interest - rate feedback model is introduced, which describes how the health of the banking system affects interest rates and thus further affects systemic risk.
### Conclusion
Through these improvements, the paper provides a more precise and flexible systemic - risk assessment framework, which not only improves the accuracy of risk calculation but also expands the application range of debt - valuation models, making them applicable to previously unconsidered situations. This helps to maintain economic stability and mitigate the impact of potential collapses.