Estimating the Cost of Informal Care with a Novel Two-Stage Approach to Individual Synthetic Control

Maria Petrillo,Daniel Valdenegro Ibarra,Charles Rahal,Yanan Zhang,Gwilym Pryce,Matthew R. Bennett

2024-11-16

Abstract:Informal carers provide the majority of care for people living with challenges related to older age, long-term illness, or disability. However, the care they provide often results in a significant income penalty for carers, a factor largely overlooked in the economics literature and policy discourse. Leveraging data from the UK Household Longitudinal Study, this paper provides the first robust causal estimates of the caring income penalty using a novel individual synthetic control based method that accounts for unit-level heterogeneity in post-treatment trajectories over time. Our baseline estimates identify an average relative income gap of up to 45%, with an average decrease of £162 in monthly income, peaking at £192 per month after 4 years, based on the difference between informal carers providing the highest-intensity of care and their synthetic counterparts. We find that the income penalty is more pronounced for women than for men, and varies by ethnicity and age.

General Economics,Methodology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to estimate the income loss caused to providers by informal care, namely the "caring income penalty". Specifically, the research aims to provide the first robust causal estimate of the caring income penalty through a novel two - stage individual synthetic control approach, based on data from the UK Household Longitudinal Study (UKHLS).

### Main problems:
1. **Estimating the caring income penalty**: The research focuses on the income loss suffered by informal care providers due to their care - giving responsibilities. This loss is often overlooked in economic literature and policy discussions.
2. **Methodological innovation**: A new two - stage individual synthetic control method is proposed to estimate the caring income penalty more accurately. This method can better handle the heterogeneity in post - treatment trajectories at the unit level.
3. **Differences in gender, ethnicity and age**: The differences in the caring income penalty among different genders, ethnicities and age groups are explored.

### Background:
- **The importance of informal care**: Informal care providers (usually family members, friends or neighbours) provide most of the care services for the elderly, the chronically ill or the disabled.
- **Economic impact**: These care - giving activities often lead to a significant reduction in the income of care providers, affecting their financial situation, health and interpersonal relationships.
- **Limitations of existing research**: Most previous studies failed to provide reliable causal estimates because they could not fully control the endogeneity problems associated with the provision of informal care.

### Methods:
- **Data source**: Data from the UK Household Longitudinal Study (UKHLS) are used.
- **Methodological innovation**: A two - stage individual synthetic control method is proposed to estimate the impact of care - giving responsibilities on income by creating synthetic control groups at the individual level.
- **First stage**: Calculate the distance measure between each treated unit and the control units in its potential control pool, and select the K closest control units.
- **Second stage**: Calculate the optimal weights of these selected control units to generate a synthetic control group, thereby estimating the caring income penalty.

### Results:
- **Overall income gap**: The study found that the personal income of high - intensity care providers decreased by an average of £162 per month, up to £192.
- **Gender differences**: The income penalty for female care providers is more pronounced than that for male care providers.
- **Ethnic differences**: The income penalty for white care providers is more severe than that for ethnic minorities.
- **Age differences**: Young care providers (aged 25 and below) suffer the most severe income penalty, with a monthly income reduction of up to £502.

### Significance:
- **Policy recommendations**: The research results provide an important reference for policymakers, helping to design more effective support measures to reduce the economic burden on informal care providers.
- **Methodological contribution**: The proposed new method has significant improvements in computational efficiency and estimation accuracy, providing a new tool for future research.

Through these analyses, this paper not only fills the gaps in existing research but also provides a new perspective for understanding the dynamic changes of the caring income penalty.