Abstract:Relationships of cause and effect are of prime importance for explaining scientific phenomena. Often, rather than just understanding the effects of causes, researchers also wish to understand how a cause $X$ affects an outcome $Y$ mechanistically -- i.e., what are the causal pathways that are activated between $X$ and $Y$. For analyzing such questions, a range of methods has been developed over decades under the rubric of causal mediation analysis. Traditional mediation analysis focuses on decomposing the average treatment effect (ATE) into direct and indirect effects, and therefore focuses on the ATE as the central quantity. This corresponds to providing explanations for associations in the interventional regime, such as when the treatment $X$ is randomized. Commonly, however, it is of interest to explain associations in the observational regime, and not just in the interventional regime. In this paper, we introduce \text{variation analysis}, an extension of mediation analysis that focuses on the total variation (TV) measure between $X$ and $Y$, written as $\mathrm{E}[Y \mid X=x_1] - \mathrm{E}[Y \mid X=x_0]$. The TV measure encompasses both causal and confounded effects, as opposed to the ATE which only encompasses causal (direct and mediated) variations. In this way, the TV measure is suitable for providing explanations in the natural regime and answering questions such as ``why is $X$ associated with $Y$?''. Our focus is on decomposing the TV measure, in a way that explicitly includes direct, indirect, and confounded variations. Furthermore, we also decompose the TV measure to include interaction terms between these different pathways. Subsequently, interaction testing is introduced, involving hypothesis tests to determine if interaction terms are significantly different from zero. If interactions are not significant, more parsimonious decompositions of the TV measure can be used.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **How to explain the association mechanism between variable \(X\) and outcome variable \(Y\) under natural - observation conditions rather than under intervention - experiment conditions**. Specifically, the author proposes a new methodological framework - **Variation Analysis** to supplement the traditional Causal Mediation Analysis, so as to better explain the causal paths, confounding effects and the interactions between these paths in natural - observation data.
### Main problem decomposition
1. **Limitations of traditional causal mediation analysis**:
- Traditional causal mediation analysis mainly focuses on decomposing the Average Treatment Effect (ATE), that is, \(E[Y|do(X = x_1)]-E[Y|do(X = x_0)]\), which is applicable to intervention - experiment conditions (such as randomized controlled trials, RCTs). However, under natural - observation conditions, researchers are often more concerned with the actual association between variables \(X\) and \(Y\), not just the intervention effect.
2. **Introduction of Total Variation (TV) measure**:
- To address the above limitations, the author introduces the Total Variation measure \(TV\), defined as \(E[Y|X = x_1]-E[Y|X = x_0]\). Unlike ATE, the TV measure includes not only causal effects (direct and indirect effects) but also confounding effects, so it is more suitable for explaining associations in natural - observation data.
3. **Decomposition of TV measure**:
- The author further decomposes the TV measure into direct effects, indirect effects and confounding effects, and particularly emphasizes the interactions between different paths. By introducing interaction terms, a more comprehensive understanding of how these effects interact with each other can be achieved.
4. **Interaction Testing**:
- The paper proposes a new concept - interaction testing, which is used to test whether the interaction term is significantly different from zero. If the interaction term is not significant, a more concise form of TV decomposition can be used, thus simplifying the explanation.
5. **Application of Structural Causal Models (SCM)**:
- The author provides the theoretical basis for interaction testing through the language of Structural Causal Models and demonstrates the application of these methods in synthetic data and real - data.
### Formula summary
- **Average Treatment Effect (ATE)**:
\[
\text{ATE}_{x_0,x_1}(y)=E[Y|do(X = x_1)]-E[Y|do(X = x_0)]
\]
- **Total Variation measure (TV)**:
\[
\text{TV}_{x_0,x_1}(y)=E[Y|X = x_1]-E[Y|X = x_0]
\]
- **Decomposition of TV measure**:
\[
\text{TV}_{x_0,x_1}(y)=\text{x - specific total effect}+\text{x - specific spurious effect}+\text{interaction effect}
\]
- **Interaction term**:
\[
\text{interaction effect}=E[Y_{x_1}-Y_{x_0}|X = x_1]-E[Y_{x_1}-Y_{x_0}|X = x_0]
\]
Through the above methods, the author provides a more comprehensive framework for understanding and explaining causal relationships and their interactions in natural - observation data, making up for the deficiencies of traditional causal mediation analysis under natural - observation conditions.