Abstract:Reinforcement Learning (RL) is a rapidly growing area of machine learning that finds its application in a broad range of domains, from finance and healthcare to robotics and gaming. Compared to other machine learning techniques, RL agents learn from their own experiences using trial and error, and improve their performance over time. However, assessing RL models can be challenging, which makes it difficult to interpret their behaviour. While reward is a widely used metric to evaluate RL models, it may not always provide an accurate measure of training performance. In some cases, the reward may seem increasing while the model's performance is actually decreasing, leading to misleading conclusions about the effectiveness of the training. To overcome this limitation, we have developed RLInspect - an interactive visual analytic tool, that takes into account different components of the RL model - state, action, agent architecture and reward, and provides a more comprehensive view of the RL training. By using RLInspect, users can gain insights into the model's behaviour, identify issues during training, and potentially correct them effectively, leading to a more robust and reliable RL system.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is the challenges of evaluating Reinforcement Learning (RL) models, especially that the existing evaluation methods (such as reward metrics) may not accurately reflect the true performance of the models. Specifically: 1. **Limitations of Reward Metrics**: Although reward is an important metric widely used to evaluate RL models, it sometimes fails to provide an accurate measure of training performance. For example, in some cases, although the reward value is increasing, the actual performance of the model may be decreasing, which can lead to a wrong judgment of the training effect. 2. **Lack of Comprehensive Evaluation Tools**: Existing evaluation methods usually focus on a single dimension (such as reward) and ignore other key components (such as state, action, agent architecture, etc.). This one - sided evaluation method makes it difficult to fully understand the behavior and potential problems of RL models. To solve the above problems, the author has developed **RLInspect** - an interactive visual analysis tool. RLInspect provides a more comprehensive perspective to evaluate the RL training process by comprehensively considering different components of RL models (state, action, agent architecture, and reward). Specifically, RLInspect can help users: - **Gain in - depth understanding of model behavior**: Through multi - dimensional data analysis, users can obtain in - depth insights into model behavior. - **Identify problems in training**: Timely discover and correct problems that may occur during the training process, thereby improving the stability and reliability of the model. - **Improve model performance**: Based on the detailed analysis results, users can adjust model parameters or algorithms in a targeted manner to optimize their performance. In conclusion, RLInspect aims to overcome the limitations of traditional evaluation methods and provide users with a more powerful and reliable tool to understand and improve RL models.

RLInspect: An Interactive Visual Approach to Assess Reinforcement Learning Algorithm

A Survey on Explainable Reinforcement Learning: Concepts, Algorithms, Challenges

Comprehensive Survey of Reinforcement Learning: From Algorithms to Practical Challenges

Toward Debugging Deep Reinforcement Learning Programs with RLExplorer

Explaining Conditions for Reinforcement Learning Behaviors from Real and Imagined Data

Achieving efficient interpretability of reinforcement learning via policy distillation and selective input gradient regularization

Experiential Explanations for Reinforcement Learning

Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Brief Survey

Reinforcement Learning Algorithms: A brief survey

Explaining Reinforcement Learning to Mere Mortals: An Empirical Study

A survey on interpretable reinforcement learning

Utilizing Explainability Techniques for Reinforcement Learning Model Assurance

ShinRL: A Library for Evaluating RL Algorithms from Theoretical and Practical Perspectives

Leveraging Reward Consistency for Interpretable Feature Discovery in Reinforcement Learning

Architecting and Visualizing Deep Reinforcement Learning Models

Reinforcement learning building control approach harnessing imitation learning

A User Study on Explainable Online Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Systems

Robot See, Robot Do: Imitation Reward for Noisy Financial Environments

Reinfier and Reintrainer: Verification and Interpretation-Driven Safe Deep Reinforcement Learning Frameworks

Social Interpretable Reinforcement Learning