Abstract:We demonstrate that Gini coefficients can be used as unified metrics to evaluate many-versus-many (all-to-all) similarity in vector spaces. Our analysis of various image datasets shows that images with the highest Gini coefficients tend to be the most similar to one another, while images with the lowest Gini coefficients are the least similar. We also show that this relationship holds true for vectorized text embeddings from various corpuses, highlighting the consistency of our method and its broad applicability across different types of data. Additionally, we demonstrate that selecting machine learning training samples that closely match the distribution of the testing dataset is far more important than ensuring data diversity. Selection of exemplary and iconic training samples with higher Gini coefficients leads to significantly better model performance compared to simply having a diverse training set with lower Gini coefficients. Thus, Gini coefficients can serve as effective criteria for selecting machine learning training samples, with our selection method outperforming random sampling methods in very sparse information settings.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: there is a lack of a unified and effective measurement method when evaluating many - versus - many (i.e., all - to - all) similarity in vector space. Specifically: 1. **Deficiencies of existing methods**: - Commonly used similarity measurement methods at present, such as cosine similarity, dot product, and Euclidean distance, are mainly used for one - to - one or one - to - many similarity evaluation. - When dealing with many - to - many similarity, these methods cannot provide a unified and comprehensive measurement standard. 2. **The proposed new method**: - The author proposes using the Gini Coefficient as a unified measurement index to evaluate many - to - many similarity. - The Gini Coefficient was originally used in economics to measure the degree of inequality in income or wealth distribution, but here it is applied to evaluate the similarity between multiple vectors in vector space. 3. **Application scenarios**: - The paper shows the application of the Gini Coefficient in image datasets (such as MNIST, Fashion - MNIST, Flowers102), proving its wide applicability and consistency on different data types. - At the same time, the Gini Coefficient is also applied to text embedding vectors (such as text fragments extracted from literary works), further verifying its effectiveness in multiple data types. 4. **Application in machine learning**: - The author also explores the application of the Gini Coefficient in selecting machine learning training samples, especially in the case of sparse information. - Research shows that selecting samples with a higher Gini Coefficient (i.e., the most representative samples) can improve model performance more than simply pursuing data diversity. ### Formula representation The calculation formula of the Gini Coefficient \( G \) is as follows: \[ G=\frac{A}{A + B} \] where: - \( A \) is the area between the Lorenz Curve and the line of absolute equality (the light blue part in the figure). - \( B \) is the area below the Lorenz Curve (the dark blue part in the figure). For a given similarity matrix \( S \), the Gini Coefficient \( g_i \) of each row vector \( s_i \) can be calculated through the following steps: 1. Calculate the cumulative distribution of \( s_i \). 2. Draw the Lorenz Curve. 3. Calculate the areas of \( A \) and \( B \). 4. Use the above formula to calculate \( g_i \). Finally, all Gini Coefficients \( G \) can be MinMax - normalized to the [0, 1] interval for easy comparison: \[ g_i'=\frac{g_i-\min(G)}{\max(G)-\min(G)} \] Through this method, the Gini Coefficient can not only quantify many - to - many similarity, but also guide the sample selection strategy in machine learning, thereby improving model performance.

Gini Coefficient as a Unified Metric for Evaluating Many-versus-Many Similarity in Vector Spaces

Relative Synergy Coefficient: A Novel Way to Detect Variable Interaction in Large Dataset

Two more ways of spelling Gini Coefficient with Applications

Gower's similarity coefficients with automatic weight selection

How to measure multidimensional variation?

Measuring Diversity in Co-creative Image Generation

The Vendi Score: A Diversity Evaluation Metric for Machine Learning

New multivariate Gini's indices

Measuring similarity between embedding spaces using induced neighborhood graphs

Evaluating Text-to-Image GANs Performance: A Comparative Analysis of Evaluation Metrics

Attribute Based Interpretable Evaluation Metrics for Generative Models

Evaluating generative networks using Gaussian mixtures of image features

The Gini Coefficient as a Morphological Measurement of Strongly Lensed Galaxies in the Image Plane

Generalized Gini indices: Complementary sparsity measures to Box-Cox sparsity measures for machine condition monitoring

On the Relationship Between the Gini Coefficient and Skewness

Bayesian Comparisons Between Representations

Metric Space Magnitude for Evaluating the Diversity of Latent Representations

Measuring Orthogonality in Representations of Generative Models

Using Skew to Assess the Quality of GAN-generated Image Features

Multivariate Gini-type discrepancies

A Coupled Similarity Kernel for Pairwise Support Vector Machine