Abstract:Quantifying uncertainty in modeling and simulation is crucial since the parameters of the physical system are inherently non-deterministic and knowledge of the system embodied in the model is incomplete or inadequate. The most well-developed nonadditive-measure theory – the DempsterShafer theory of evidence – is explored for uncertainty quantification and propagation. For “uncertainty quantification,” we propose the MinMax method to construct belief functions to represent uncertainty in the information (data set) involving the inseparably mixed type of uncertainties. Using the principle of minimum uncertainty and the concepts of entropy and specificity, the MinMax method specifies a partition of a finite interval on the real line and assigns belief masses to the uniform subintervals. The method is illustrated in a simple example and applied to the total uncertainty quantification in flight plan of two actual flights. For “uncertainty propagation,” we construct belief/probability density functions for the output or the statistics of the output given the belief/probability density functions for the uncertain input variables. Different approaches are introduced for aleatory uncertainty propagation, epistemic uncertainty propagation, and mixed type of uncertainty propagation. The impact of the uncertain input parameters on the model output is studied using these approaches in a simple example of aerodynamic flow: quasi-one-dimensional nozzle flow. In the situation that multiple models are available for the same quantity of interest, the combination rules in the Dempster-Shafer theory can be utilized to integrate the predictions from the different models. In the present work, we propose a robust and comprehensive procedure to combine multiple bodies of evidence. It is robust in that it can combine multiple bodies of evidence, consistent or otherwise. It is comprehensive in the sense that it examines the bodies of evidence strongly conflicted with others, reconstructs the basic belief mass functions by discounting, and then fuses all the bodies of evidence using an optimally parametrized combination rule. The proposed combination procedure is applied to radiotherapy dose response outcome analysis.

Evidential time-to-event prediction with calibrated uncertainty quantification

An evidential time-to-event prediction model based on Gaussian random fuzzy numbers

Toward Conditional Distribution Calibration in Survival Prediction

Uncertainty quantification for intervals

Predicting disease risks by matching quantiles estimation for censored data.

A Threshold-free Prospective Prediction Accuracy Measure for Censored Time to Event Data

Uncertainty-Aware Optimal Treatment Selection for Clinical Time Series

Uncertainty Quantification and Interpretability for Clinical Trial Approval Prediction

Assessing quantile prediction with censored quantile regression models

Uncertainty-aware Health Diagnostics Via Class-balanced Evidential Deep Learning

Enhancing Uncertainty Quantification in Drug Discovery with Censored Regression Labels

Uncertainty Quantification on Clinical Trial Outcome Prediction

Transformation-Invariant Learning of Optimal Individualized Decision Rules with Time-to-Event Outcomes

Uncertainty prediction and calibration using multi-expert gating mechanism

Semisupervised Calibration of Risk with Noisy Event Times (SCORNET) using electronic health record data

EsurvFusion: An evidential multimodal survival fusion model based on Gaussian random fuzzy numbers

Evidential-EM Algorithm Applied to Progressively Censored Observations.

Uncertainty Regularized Evidential Regression

Uncertainty Quantification and Data Fusion Based on Dempster-Shafer Theory

A personalized Uncertainty Quantification framework for patient survival models: estimating individual uncertainty of patients with metastatic brain tumors in the absence of ground truth

Exploring Uncertainty in Regression Neural Networks for Construction of Prediction Intervals