The Milky Way accretion history compared to cosmological simulations -- from bulge to dwarf galaxy infall

F. Hammer,Y. J. Jiao,G. A. Mamon,Y. B. Yang,I. Akib,P. Amram,H. F. Wang,J. L. Wang,L. Chemin
2024-11-12
Abstract:Galactic halos are known to grow hierarchically, inside out. This implies a correlation between the infall lookback time of satellites and their binding energy. In fact, cosmological simulations predict a linear relation between infall lookback time and log binding energy, with a small scatter. Gaia measurements of the bulk proper motions of globular clusters and dwarf satellites of the Milky Way are sufficiently accurate to establish the kinetic energies of these systems. Assuming the gravitational potential of the Milky Way, we can deduce the binding energies of the dwarf satellites, as well as of the galaxies previously accreted by the Milky Way, which can, for the first time, be compared to cosmological simulations. We find that the infall lookback time vs. binding energy relation found in a cosmological simulation matches that for the early accretion events, once the simulated MW total mass within 21 kpc is rescaled to 2 $10^{11}$ solar masses, in good agreement with previous estimates from globular cluster kinematics and from the rotation curve. However, the vast majority of the dwarf galaxies are clear outliers to this re-scaled relation, unless they are very recent infallers. In other words, the very low binding energies of most dwarf galaxies compared to Sgr and previous accreted galaxies suggests that most of them have been accreted much later than 8 or even 5 Gyr ago. We also find that some cosmological simulations show too dynamically hot sub-halo systems when compared to identified MW substructures, leading to overestimate the impact of satellites on the Galaxy rotation curve.
Astrophysics of Galaxies,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?