Abstract:This paper presents a hierarchical, performance-based framework for the design optimization of multi-fingered soft grippers. To address the need for systematically defined performance indices, the framework structures the optimization process into three integrated layers: Task Space, Motion Space, and Design Space. In the Task Space, performance indices are defined as core objectives, while the Motion Space interprets these into specific movement primitives. Finally, the Design Space applies parametric and topological optimization techniques to refine the geometry and material distribution of the system, achieving a balanced design across key performance metrics. The framework's layered structure enhances SG design, ensuring balanced performance and scalability for complex tasks and contributing to broader advancements in soft robotics.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to address the lack of a systematic performance - optimization framework in the design of soft - robot grippers (Soft Grippers, SGs). Most of the current research focuses on a single gripper configuration and is mainly verified through experiments. Optimization efforts are usually limited to a single mechanical objective (such as enhancing motion or force distribution) and fail to comprehensively consider the multi - aspect performance requirements of SGs. Therefore, there is an urgent gap to be filled: how to systematically balance key functional objectives during the design process to ensure that soft grippers are flexible, stable, and adaptable in a variety of tasks.
To solve this problem, the paper proposes a performance - based hierarchical design - optimization framework. This framework divides the optimization process into three integrated levels: Task Space, Motion Space, and Design Space. The specific functions of each level are as follows:
1. **Task Space**:
- Define high - level performance objectives as the core guiding principles for design.
- Determine key performance indices (Performance Indices, PIs), such as dexterity, adaptability, stability, and reachability. These indices are crucial for achieving multi - functional operations.
- Establish evaluation criteria to ensure that each PI can be measured and conforms to the overall performance objectives.
2. **Motion Space**:
- Transform high - level PIs into specific movement primitives, such as bending and twisting. These movements are essential for achieving dexterity, adaptability, and stability in practical scenarios.
- Provide a bridge from abstract PIs to specific motion behaviors, ensuring that the design can directly implement these behaviors.
3. **Design Space**:
- Apply parameter and topological optimization techniques to refine the physical structure and material properties of SGs to meet the PIs defined through the Motion Space.
- Adjust specific design variables (such as segment length, chamber configuration, material elasticity, etc.) to ensure that the design performs well in complex tasks.
Through this hierarchical structure, this framework aims to systematically address the complex interactions between the geometry, actuation, and task - specific requirements of soft grippers, thereby improving the performance of soft grippers in various applications, especially in scenarios requiring dexterity, stability, and adaptability. This not only enhances the functionality and reliability of soft grippers but also provides technical support for a wider range of application areas, such as healthcare, logistics, and human - machine interaction.
### Example of Mathematical Formulas
To better understand the optimization model, the following is the mathematical representation of the multi - objective optimization function:
\[
\min_{x} \left[ f_{\text{dexterity}}(x), f_{\text{adaptability}}(x), f_{\text{stability}}(x), f_{\text{reachability}}(x) \right]
\]
where \( x \) represents the design variable vector, and each \( f_i(x) \) corresponds to a performance index. This formula allows for the exploration of trade - offs and synergy effects between different indices, thus providing a solid foundation for the performance optimization of soft grippers.
In addition, constraint conditions are also very important to ensure that the design is feasible and effective under actual conditions. For example, mechanical constraints can be expressed as:
\[
g_j(x) \leq 0, \quad j = 1, \ldots, m
\]
\[
h_k(x) = 0, \quad k = 1, \ldots, p
\]
These constraint conditions ensure the feasibility of the design in terms of stress, strain, geometric dimensions, and motion range.
In this way, the framework proposed in this paper provides a systematic, multi - level method for the design optimization of soft grippers, aiming to comprehensively improve their performance in complex tasks.