Seeing Through the Fog: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Hallucination Detection Systems

Alexander Thomas,Seth Rosen,Vishnu Vettrivel
2024-11-08
Abstract:This paper presents a comparative analysis of hallucination detection systems for AI, focusing on automatic summarization and question answering tasks for Large Language Models (LLMs). We evaluate different hallucination detection systems using the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and cost-effectiveness metrics. Our results indicate that although advanced models can perform better they come at a much higher cost. We also demonstrate how an ideal hallucination detection system needs to maintain performance across different model sizes. Our findings highlight the importance of choosing a detection system aligned with specific application needs and resource constraints. Future research will explore hybrid systems and automated identification of underperforming components to enhance AI reliability and efficiency in detecting and mitigating hallucinations.
Computation and Language,Artificial Intelligence
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the hallucinations problem generated by large - language models (LLMs) when generating text. Hallucinations refer to seemingly reasonable but actually wrong or misleading content generated by the model. These problems are particularly prominent in automatic summarization and question - answering tasks, because these tasks require that the content generated by the model must be consistent with and accurate to the input data. Hallucinations not only affect the reliability of the model, but may also lead to dangers in practical applications, such as financial losses, legal liabilities and reputation damage. The paper aims to evaluate the effectiveness and cost - effectiveness of different hallucination detection systems by comparing them. Specifically, the researchers focused on the following aspects: 1. **Performance evaluation**: Use indicators such as Diagnostic Odds Ratio (DOR) to measure the accuracy of different hallucination detection systems. 2. **Cost analysis**: Evaluate the operating costs of different systems, especially the cost increase when using more advanced models. 3. **Applicability**: Explore the performance of different detection systems in different tasks (such as automatic summarization and retrieval - enhanced question - answering) to determine which system is most suitable for a specific application scenario. Through these analyses, the paper hopes to provide guidance for developers to choose appropriate hallucination detection systems, thereby improving the reliability and safety of large - language models in practical applications.