Quantifying the Contamination From Nearby Stellar Companions in Gaia DR3 Photometry
Kendall Sullivan,Adam L. Kraus,Travis A. Berger,Daniel Huber
2024-11-07
Abstract:Identifying and removing binary stars from stellar samples is a crucial but complicated task. Regardless of how carefully a sample is selected, some binaries will remain and complicate interpretation of results, especially via flux contamination of survey photometry. One such sample is the data from the Gaia spacecraft, which is collecting photometry and astrometry of more than $10^{9}$ stars. To quantify the impact of binaries on Gaia photometry, we assembled a sample of known binary stars observed with adaptive optics and with accurately measured parameters, which we used to predict Gaia photometry for each stellar component. We compared the predicted photometry to the actual Gaia photometry for each system, and found that the contamination of Gaia photometry because of multiplicity decreases non-linearly from near-complete contamination ($\rho \leq 0''.15$) to no contamination (binary projected separation, or $\rho > 0''.3$). We provide an analytic relation to analytically correct photometric bias in a sample of Gaia stars using the binary separation. This correction is necessary because the Gaia PSF photometry extraction does not fully remove the secondary star flux for binaries with separations with $\rho \lesssim 0''.3$. We also evaluated the utility of various Gaia quality-of-fit metrics for identifying binary stars and found that RUWE remains the best indicator for unresolved binaries, but multi-peak image fraction probes a separation regime not currently accessible to RUWE.
Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics,Solar and Stellar Astrophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: to quantify the contamination effect of adjacent stellar companions on the Gaia DR3 photometric measurements. Specifically, the author focuses on how to identify and correct the photometric bias caused by the presence of secondary stars in binary star systems. This is very important in astronomical research because the existence of binary star systems can have complex effects on observational results, especially when making sample selections through photometric measurements.
### Main problems and background of the paper
1. **Effects of binary star systems**:
- Binary star systems are very common in astronomy. Approximately 50% of main - sequence FGK - type stars exist in binary or multiple - star systems.
- Binary star systems introduce observational and physical complexities, such as affecting the evolution of planetary disks, affecting the survival and properties of exoplanets, and introducing scatter and observational bias in the Hertzsprung - Russell diagram (HR diagram).
2. **Photometric measurement problems in the Gaia mission**:
- The Gaia mission has collected photometric and astrometric data for more than 10^9 stars.
- For binary star systems with a small separation angle, Gaia's PSF photometric extraction method cannot completely remove the flux of the secondary star, resulting in contaminated photometric measurements.
- This contamination varies with the binary projected separation angle (\(\rho\)), from almost complete contamination (\(\rho \leq 0.15''\)) to no contamination (\(\rho > 0.3''\)).
### Research objectives
- **Quantify contamination**: Predict and quantify the degree of contamination of binary star systems on Gaia photometric measurements through the data of known binary star samples.
- **Provide correction methods**: Give an analytical relationship to correct the photometric bias according to the binary separation angle.
- **Evaluation metrics**: Evaluate the effectiveness of various Gaia quality - fitting metrics (such as RUWE, multi - peak image fraction, etc.) in identifying binary star systems.
### Method overview
1. **Sample selection**:
- A set of data of known binary star systems was collected, and their parameters were accurately measured using adaptive optics techniques.
2. **Model prediction and comparison**:
- Synthetic photometry was used to predict the Gaia photometry of each stellar component and compare it with the actually observed Gaia photometry.
3. **Contamination proportion calculation**:
- Define the contamination proportion \( f_{\text{contaminate}}=\frac{F_G - F_{\text{pri}}}{F_{\text{sec}}} \), where \( F_G \) is the total luminosity of the composite system, and \( F_{\text{pri}} \) and \( F_{\text{sec}} \) are the luminosities of the primary and secondary stars respectively.
4. **Fit the contamination function**:
- Use a tunable super - Gaussian function to fit the relationship between the contamination proportion and the separation angle:
\[
f_{\text{contaminate}}=\exp \left(-\left(\frac{\rho^2}{2\sigma^2}\right)^k\right)
\]
- The best - fit parameters are \(\sigma = 0.13\pm0.02\) and \(k = 1.4\pm0.6\).
### Conclusions
- This study shows that the photometric contamination of binary star systems gradually decreases as the separation angle increases, and proposes an analytical formula to correct this contamination.
- RUWE is still the best indicator for identifying unresolved binary stars, and the multi - peak image fraction can detect the separation range that RUWE cannot currently cover.
Through these studies, the author provides important tools and methods for understanding and correcting binary star contamination in Gaia photometric measurements.