Investigating mutual coupling in the MWA Phase II compact array

Katherine Elder,Daniel C. Jacobs
2024-11-07
Abstract:Measurement of the power spectrum of high redshift 21 cm emission from neutral hydrogen probes the formation of the first luminous objects and the ionization of intergalactic medium by the first stars. However, the 21 cm signal at these redshifts is orders of magnitude fainter than astrophysical foregrounds, making it challenging to measure. Power spectrum techniques may be able to avoid these foregrounds by extracting foreground-free Fourier modes, but this is exacerbated by instrumental systematics that can add spectral structure to the data, leaking foreground power to the foreground-free Fourier modes. It is therefore imperative that any instrumental systematic effects are properly understood and mitigated. One such systematic occurs when neighboring antennas have undesired coupling. A systematic in Phase II data from the MWA was identified which manifests as excess correlation in the visibilities. One possible explanation for such an effect is mutual coupling between antennas. We have built a numerical electromagnetic software simulation of the antenna beam using FEKO to estimate the amplitude of this effect for multiple antennas in the MWA. We also calculate coupling predicted by the re-radiation model which is found to be somewhat lower than the coupling coefficients produced by the simulation. We find that with many approximations both types of mutual coupling predictions are somewhat lower than the minimum necessary to detect the brightest 21 cm models. However more work is necessary to better validate the required level of coupling and to verify that approximations did not under estimate the level of coupling.
Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: in the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) Phase II compact array, how do the systematic effects caused by mutual coupling between antennas affect the measurement of the 21 - centimeter signal. Specifically, the paper focuses on: 1. **Challenges in Detecting High - Redshift 21 - centimeter Signals**: - The 21 - centimeter signal emitted from neutral hydrogen during the Cosmic Dawn and the Epoch of Reionization (EoR) is 10 to \(10^8\) times fainter than the astronomical foreground. This makes the measurement of the 21 - centimeter signal extremely difficult. - The foreground signal is spectrally smooth, while the 21 - centimeter signal is not. Therefore, the 21 - centimeter signal can be observed in a certain region in the two - dimensional power spectrum (called the "EoR window"). However, instrumental systematic effects may cause the foreground signal to leak into the EoR window, masking the 21 - centimeter signal. 2. **The Influence of Mutual Coupling**: - Mutual coupling between antennas is a possible systematic effect, which will cause unnecessary correlations between adjacent antennas, thus affecting data quality. - Kolopanis et al. (2023) found an unidentified systematic effect in the shortest baselines of MWA Phase II data, manifested as excessive correlations in the visibilities. A possible explanation is mutual coupling between antennas. 3. **Research Objectives**: - The paper aims to study the mutual coupling effect between antennas in the MWA Phase II compact array through numerical electromagnetic simulations and analytical models. - By comparing the results of these two methods, evaluate the impact of mutual coupling on the measurement of the 21 - centimeter signal and verify whether mutual coupling is the cause of the excessive correlations in the short - baseline data. ### Main Research Contents - **Numerical Electromagnetic Simulation**: Use FEKO software to perform numerical electromagnetic simulations and calculate the coupling coefficients between multiple antennas. - **Analytical Model**: Based on the re - radiation model, assume that each antenna re - radiates a part of the received power and propagates it to other antennas. - **Comparison and Verification**: Compare the numerical simulation results with the coupling coefficients predicted by the analytical model to verify the validity of the analytical model. - **Full - Array Estimation**: Based on the above results, roughly estimate the mutual coupling effect in the entire hexagonal sub - array and compare it with the requirements of the 21 - centimeter signal. ### Conclusions Through the research of numerical electromagnetic simulations and analytical models, the paper preliminarily verifies that mutual coupling may be an important reason for the excessive correlations in the MWA Phase II short - baseline data. However, further work is still required to verify the required coupling level in more detail and ensure that the simplified assumptions do not underestimate the coupling effect. ### Key Formulas - **Far - Field Radiation Pattern**: \[ J(\theta, \phi) \] where \(\theta\) and \(\phi\) represent different electric field polarization directions respectively, and \(p\) and \(q\) represent feed polarizations. - **Coherence Matrix**: \[ C(\hat{n})=\begin{pmatrix} I + Q&U + iV\\ U - iV&I - Q \end{pmatrix} \] where the components of the matrix are represented by Stokes parameters. - **Baseline Visibility**: \[ V_{ij}=N h_0^2\int_{4\pi}J(\hat{n})C(\hat{n})J(\hat{n})^\dagger e^{-i 2\pi\nu b_{ij}\cdot\hat{n}/c}d\Omega \] where \(N\) is a normalization constant, \(h_0\) is the effective height, \(J(\hat{n})\) is the far - field radiation pattern, \(C(\hat{n})\) is the coherence matrix, and \(b_{ij}\) is the antenna.