Abstract:The spatio-temporal nature of live-cell microscopy data poses challenges in the analysis of cell states which is fundamental in bioimaging. Deep-learning based segmentation or tracking methods rely on large amount of high quality annotations to work effectively. In this work, we explore an alternative solution: using feature maps obtained from self-supervised representation learning (SSRL) on time arrow prediction (TAP) for the downstream supervised task of cell event recognition. We demonstrate through extensive experiments and analysis that this approach can achieve better performance with limited annotation compared to models trained from end to end using fully supervised approach. Our analysis also provides insight into applications of the SSRL using TAP in live-cell microscopy.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is the challenge of identifying cell events (such as cell division and death) in live - cell microscopy data. Specifically, these problems include: 1. **Analysis challenges brought by spatio - temporal characteristics**: Live - cell microscopy data has spatio - temporal characteristics, which complicates the analysis of cell states. 2. **The need for labeled data**: Traditional deep - learning - based segmentation or tracking methods rely on a large amount of high - quality labeled data, and the acquisition of these data is costly and time - consuming. To solve these problems, the authors propose an alternative: using self - supervised representation learning (SSRL) to obtain feature maps through time - arrow prediction (TAP) and apply them to cell - event recognition in downstream tasks. This method can achieve good performance even with limited labeling and outperforms fully - supervised learning methods. ### Main contributions 1. **Effectiveness of time - arrow prediction**: - Extensive experiments show that using time - arrow prediction (TAP) can effectively obtain dense features that are very useful for cell - event recognition. - In the case of limited labeled data, after fine - tuning with TAP features, the model performance is better than that of fully - supervised methods. 2. **Detailed analysis and improvement**: - Analyzed the mispredictions and compared the performance under different labeling standards. - Used temperature scaling to calibrate the prediction results and provide more accurate confidence estimates. ### Method overview - **Time - arrow prediction**: - Given a pair of image patches \(x_t\), \(t\in[0, T]\), the goal is to predict the temporal order of these two images. - Train the feature mapping \(f\) and the classification head \(h\) by minimizing the binary cross - entropy loss. - **Cell - event recognition**: - Use the feature mapping \(f\) learned from TAP to identify cell - division or - death events. - Calculate the conditional probability \(\hat{y}:=P(E|z_t, z_{t + \Delta t})\), where \(E\) represents the probability of a division or death event occurring in \(x_t\) or \(x_{t+\Delta t}\). ### Experimental results - **Pre - training and feature visualization**: - Visualize the feature maps using methods such as Grad - CAM to show the cell - morphology changes that the model focuses on. - **Comparison of different training strategies**: - Compared the effects of using a linear classification head and a ResNet classification head, and the results show that the ResNet classification head has better performance. - **Influence of label standards**: - Explored the influence of different label standards on model performance and found that appropriate label standards can improve model performance. ### Conclusion Through a large number of experiments and analyses, the authors have proven that time - arrow prediction, as a pre - training task in self - supervised representation learning, has significant advantages in cell - event recognition in live - cell microscopy data. This method not only reduces the dependence on large - scale labeled data but also improves the robustness and accuracy of the model.

Self-supervised Representation Learning for Cell Event Recognition through Time Arrow Prediction

Self-supervised dense representation learning for live-cell microscopy with time arrow prediction

Unsupervised Two-Path Neural Network for Cell Event Detection and Classification Using Spatiotemporal Patterns

Microscopy Cell Segmentation Via Convolutional LSTM Networks

Self-supervised Activity Representation Learning with Incremental Data: An Empirical Study

Temporally-Embedded Self-Supervised Video Representation Learning

Self-supervised Spatio-temporal Representation Learning for Videos by Predicting Motion and Appearance Statistics

Skip-Clip: Self-Supervised Spatiotemporal Representation Learning by Future Clip Order Ranking

Learning unsupervised feature representations for single cell microscopy images with paired cell inpainting

Self-Supervised Representation Learning: Introduction, advances, and challenges

Event Stream Super-Resolution Via Spatiotemporal Constraint Learning

Self-Attention ConvLSTM for Spatiotemporal Prediction

Semi-supervised estimation of event temporal length for cell event detection

Enhancing Cell Tracking with a Time-Symmetric Deep Learning Approach

Self-Supervised Learning of Representations for Space Generates Multi-Modular Grid Cells

Learning Spatial-Temporal Implicit Neural Representations for Event-Guided Video Super-Resolution

Temporal-Spatial Mapping for Action Recognition

End-to-End Learning of Object Motion Estimation from Retinal Events for Event-Based Object Tracking

EventRPG: Event Data Augmentation with Relevance Propagation Guidance

Self-STORM: Deep Unrolled Self-Supervised Learning for Super-Resolution Microscopy

Asymmetric Event-Guided Video Super-Resolution