Abstract:Contrastive learning attempts to learn representations from un-labeled data; it does so via a loss function that encourages the embedding of a point to be close to that of its augmentations, and far from the embeddings of random other points. This simple idea performs remarkably well, yet it is not precisely theoretically understood why this is the case. In this paper we analyze contrastive learning (specifically, the InfoNCE loss) in a natural context: dimensionality reduction in Gaussian Mixture Models. Crucially, we define an augmentation of a data point as being another independent draw from the same underlying mixture component. We show that vanilla InfoNCE is able to find the optimal lower-dimensional subspace even when the Gaussians are not isotropic -- something that vanilla spectral techniques cannot do. We further extend our analyses to multi-modal contrastive learning algorithms (e.g., CLIP). In this setting we show that contrastive learning learns the subset of fisher-optimal subspace, effectively filtering out all the noise from the learnt representations.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is to understand the performance of contrastive learning in Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM) and its theoretical basis. Specifically, by analyzing the application of the InfoNCE loss function in GMM, the paper explores why contrastive learning can effectively learn representations from unlabeled data and, in some cases, outperform traditional methods. ### Main problems and goals of the paper 1. **Understanding the theoretical basis of contrastive learning**: - Contrastive learning encourages the embeddings of a sample to be close to those of its augmented version and far from those of other random samples through a loss function. Although this method performs well in practice, the theoretical mechanism behind it is not yet fully understood. - This paper aims to provide a theoretical explanation by analyzing contrastive learning, especially the InfoNCE loss function, in the context of GMM. 2. **Exploring the advantages of contrastive learning in dimensionality reduction tasks**: - Traditional dimensionality reduction methods such as SVD perform well when dealing with spherical Gaussian mixture models, but not so well when dealing with more complex non - spherical Gaussian mixture models. - This paper investigates whether contrastive learning can find the optimal low - dimensional subspace in these complex scenarios and explains the reasons for its success. 3. **Application of multi - modal contrastive learning**: - In multi - modal data (such as image - text pairs), contrastive learning also performs well. This paper also extends the analysis of multi - modal contrastive learning algorithms (such as CLIP) to explore their ability to learn shared representations between different modalities. ### Main contributions - **First analysis of contrastive learning in the context of GMM**: By introducing a new formal method to define sample augmentation pairs, this paper analyzes the effectiveness of contrastive learning in the context of GMM for the first time. - **Proving the advantages of contrastive learning in non - spherical GMM**: Research shows that when there are augmentation pairs, contrastive learning can find the optimal linear projection and outperform traditional methods even in non - spherical GMM. - **Theoretical analysis of multi - modal contrastive learning**: For multi - modal data, the paper shows that contrastive learning can learn a subset of the Fisher - optimal subspaces and effectively filter out noise directions. ### Summary Through theoretical analysis and experimental verification, this paper reveals the potential advantages of contrastive learning in Gaussian mixture models, especially its performance in dealing with complex data distributions. This not only deepens our understanding of contrastive learning but also provides theoretical support for future research.

Understanding Contrastive Learning via Gaussian Mixture Models

Contrastive Learning Is Spectral Clustering On Similarity Graph

Debiased Graph Contrastive Learning.

Full-Attention Driven Graph Contrastive Learning: with Effective Mutual Information Insight

Gaussian Mixture Variational Autoencoder with Contrastive Learning for Multi-Label Classification

Contrastive Learning Via Equivariant Representation

Understanding and Generalizing Contrastive Learning from the Inverse Optimal Transport Perspective.

Augmentation-Free Graph Contrastive Learning of Invariant-Discriminative Representations

Heterogeneous Graph Contrastive Multi-view Learning

Graph contrastive learning with min-max mutual information

On the Importance of Contrastive Loss in Multimodal Learning

Smoothed Graph Contrastive Learning via Seamless Proximity Integration

MA-GCL: Model Augmentation Tricks for Graph Contrastive Learning

A New Mechanism for Eliminating Implicit Conflict in Graph Contrastive Learning

Towards Equivariant Graph Contrastive Learning via Cross-Graph Augmentation

Revisiting Graph Contrastive Learning from the Perspective of Graph Spectrum

MetAug: Contrastive Learning via Meta Feature Augmentation

GCL: Contrastive learning instead of graph convolution for node classification

InfoGCL: Information-Aware Graph Contrastive Learning

Localized Contrastive Learning on Graphs

Contrastive Multimodal Fusion with TupleInfoNCE