Abstract:In this work, we statistically analyze the radar cross section (RCS) of different test targets present in an indoor factory (InF) scenario specified by 3rd Generation Partnership Project considering bistatic configuration. The test targets that we consider are drones, humans, quadruped robot and a robotic arm. We consider two drones of different sizes and five human subjects for RCS characterization. For the drones, we measure the RCS when they are are flying over a given point and while they are rotating over the same point. For human subjects, we measure the RCS while standing still, sitting still and walking. For quadruped robot and robotic arm, we consider a continuous random motion emulating different tasks which they are supposed to perfom in typical InF scenario. We employ different distributions, such as Normal, Lognormal, Gamma, Rician, Weibull, Rayleigh and Exponential to fit the measurement data. From the statistical analysis, we gather that Lognormal distribution can fit all the considered targets in the InF scenario.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the statistical characteristic analysis of radar cross - section (RCS) of different types of targets in the indoor factory (InF) environment. Specifically, the author aims to analyze and characterize the RCS of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), humans, quadruped robots and robotic arms in different postures and motion states through statistical methods, and determine the probability distribution model that is most suitable for describing the RCS of these targets.
### Research Background and Problems
1. **Integrated Sensing and Communication (ISAC) Technology**:
- With the fusion of wireless communication and radar sensing technologies, ISAC has become a promising technology that can efficiently utilize precious radio resources and hardware for sensing and communication.
- ISAC can adopt monostatic and bistatic configurations. In the bistatic configuration, the transmitter (Tx) and the receiver (Rx) are spatially separated, resulting in the existence of the bistatic angle, which has an impact on RCS measurement.
2. **Importance of RCS**:
- RCS is an important feature of a target, reflecting the attenuation of the signal caused by the target. It depends on the geometric structure, material and frequency of the target.
- RCS is crucial for channel modeling in ISAC, especially in different application scenarios, such as urban micro - environments, urban macro - environments and indoor factories.
3. **Research Motivation**:
- The indoor factory environment is characterized by large rooms, mechanical equipment and dense clutter, and the operating frequency is 25GHz. In this environment, the RCS characteristics of different types of targets (such as UAVs, humans, robots) may be different.
- Understanding the RCS statistical characteristics of these targets helps to optimize the design and performance of ISAC systems.
### Research Content
1. **Target Types**:
- UAVs: Including two UAVs of different sizes (Mavic Pro 2 and Matrice 300 RTK), and RCS measurements are carried out when they are stationary, hovering and rotating respectively.
- Humans: Five testers conduct RCS measurements in three states: standing, sitting and walking.
- Quadruped robots and robotic arms: Simulate typical tasks in the factory and conduct RCS measurements under continuous random motion.
2. **Measurement Methods**:
- Use the bistatic configuration for measurement, record the signal strength reflected from the target, and obtain the RCS after calibration.
- The measurement environment is an indoor factory of 10m × 5m, the ceiling height is 8.5m, the distance between Tx and Rx is 3.6m, and the observation point is 3m away from the line connecting Tx and Rx.
3. **Data Analysis**:
- Conduct statistical analysis on the measurement data, and try to fit the RCS data with distribution models such as Normal, Lognormal, Gamma, Rician, Weibull, Rayleigh and Exponential.
- The results show that the Lognormal distribution can fit the measured RCS data well in almost all scenarios.
### Main Conclusions
- **UAVs**:
- The RCS in different postures (hovering, rotating, stationary) and different directions shows significant differences, especially the battery position has a great impact on the RCS.
- **Humans**:
- In the standing, sitting and walking states, the RCS shows different statistical characteristics. The RCS is relatively stable when standing, decreases when sitting, and introduces dynamic changes when walking.
- **Robots**:
- The RCS of quadruped robots and robotic arms in simulated tasks also shows direction - dependence, and the RCS in different postures and motion states is different.
Through this research, the author hopes to provide a valuable reference for the application of ISAC systems in the indoor factory environment, especially in RCS modeling and prediction.