Abstract:In this paper, we contribute to previously known results on lattices constructed by algebraic function fields, or function field lattices in short. First, motivated by the non-well-roundedness property of certain hyperelliptic function field lattices (Ates and Stichtenoth, 2016), we explore the successive minima of these lattices in detail. We also study the determinant of hyperelliptic function field lattices. Finally, we show a connection between the automorphism groups of algebraic function fields and function field lattices, based on ideas from Böttcher et al., 2016.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the paper attempts to solve
This paper aims to explore and solve several key problems related to hyperelliptic function field lattices. Specifically:
1. **Successive minima of non - well - rounded hyperelliptic function field lattices**:
- Since some hyperelliptic function field lattices are not well - rounded, the author conducts in - depth research on the successive minima of these lattices. By analyzing their genus, defining polynomial, and sets of places used to construct the lattices, the author attempts to understand the support of principal divisors on specific sets of places.
2. **Calculation of the determinant of hyperelliptic function field lattices**:
- The author calculates the determinant of some hyperelliptic function field lattices for the first time, which is an area that has not been explored before. The research results show that under certain assumptions, some hyperelliptic function field lattices have higher densities. For lattices constructed from rational places, it is even difficult to determine a basis, mainly due to the complex structure of the zero - class group, which makes the accurate calculation of the determinant more difficult.
3. **Automorphism groups of function field lattices**:
- The author devotes to studying the automorphism groups of function field lattices to understand whether the automorphisms of function fields induce automorphisms of lattices. Although the automorphism groups of function fields and lattices are usually not equivalent, they are related. For example, the automorphisms of rational function fields will induce a subgroup of the automorphism group of the corresponding rational function field lattice. The author conducts similar analyses on elliptic and hyperelliptic function field lattices and uses two methods to study these automorphisms: one is the automorphisms from the function fields themselves, and the other is the additional automorphisms not directly related to the function fields. These automorphisms usually appear as permutations of the coordinates of function field lattices.
### Summary
The main objective of this paper is to further understand and improve the properties of hyperelliptic function field lattices through the work in the above three aspects, especially for non - well - rounded lattices. By analyzing in detail the successive minima, determinants, and automorphism groups of these lattices, the author hopes to provide new insights and tools for research in this field.