Generative AI and Agency in Education: A Critical Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis

Jasper Roe,Mike Perkins

2024-11-01

Abstract:This scoping review examines the relationship between Generative AI (GenAI) and agency in education, analyzing the literature available through the lens of Critical Digital Pedagogy. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we collected 10 studies from academic databases focusing on both learner and teacher agency in GenAI-enabled environments. We conducted an AI-supported hybrid thematic analysis that revealed three key themes: Control in Digital Spaces, Variable Engagement and Access, and Changing Notions of Agency. The findings suggest that while GenAI may enhance learner agency through personalization and support, it also risks exacerbating educational inequalities and diminishing learner autonomy in certain contexts. This review highlights gaps in the current research on GenAI's impact on agency. These findings have implications for educational policy and practice, suggesting the need for frameworks that promote equitable access while preserving learner agency in GenAI-enhanced educational environments.

Computers and Society,Artificial Intelligence

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the relationship between generative artificial intelligence (Generative AI, GenAI) and agency in education. Specifically, through the perspective of Critical Digital Pedagogy (CDP), the paper analyzes the impact of GenAI on the agency of learners and teachers, and evaluates its potential advantages and risks in different educational environments.

### Main Problem Decomposition

1. **Conceptualization of GenAI and Agency**
- The research explores how the relationship between GenAI and learner agency is defined and understood in academic literature.
- The key lies in understanding whether and how GenAI affects learners' ability to make autonomous decisions, self - regulate learning, and participation.

2. **Influence from the Perspective of CDP**
- Starting from the perspective of Critical Digital Pedagogy, the research studies the impact of GenAI on learner agency, especially issues related to power, equity, and digital literacy.
- Critical Digital Pedagogy emphasizes that education should empower students with the ability to think and act critically. Therefore, the paper focuses on whether GenAI enhances this ability or may strengthen the existing power structures.

3. **Gaps in Existing Research**
- The paper aims to identify the deficiencies in current research and provide directions for future research.
- In particular, regarding the specific mechanisms and effects of GenAI on agency in educational environments, current research is still insufficient.

### Methodology

In order to systematically identify and analyze existing literature, the author adopts the PRISMA - ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta - Analyses - Scoping Reviews) review method and collects relevant literature from multiple databases. Through a comprehensive analysis of these literatures, the author extracts three main themes:

1. **Control in Digital Space**
- It explores the re - definition of traditional roles and control mechanisms in GenAI - driven educational environments.
- For example, how teachers can obtain more decision - making power and action ability in Hybrid Intelligence (HI) systems.

2. **Differences in Participation and Access**
- It analyzes the different levels of participation and access of learners when using GenAI.
- The research finds that learners' attitudes towards GenAI range from optimistic to skeptical, depending on their personal experiences and backgrounds.

3. **Changes in the Concept of Agency**
- It explores how learners apply key abilities and strategic methods to the use of GenAI.
- For example, some students may use GenAI tools to improve grammar and writing quality, while others may rely entirely on these tools to complete tasks, thus weakening the purpose of education.

### Conclusion

The paper points out that while GenAI has the potential to enhance learners' agency through personalized support, there are also risks of exacerbating educational inequality and weakening learners' autonomy. Therefore, future educational policies and practices need to develop frameworks to ensure fair access rights while maintaining learners' agency in GenAI - enhanced educational environments.

In this way, the paper not only summarizes the current research results but also points out the direction for future research, especially further exploring the impact of GenAI on educational agency under the guidance of Critical Digital Pedagogy.