Abstract:Background and Aims Most clinical information is encoded as text, but extracting quantitative information from text is challenging. Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for natural language processing and can parse clinical text. However, many LLMs including ChatGPT reside in remote data centers, which disqualifies them from processing personal healthcare data. We present an open-source pipeline using the local LLM 'Llama 2' for extracting quantitative information from clinical text and evaluate its use to detect clinical features of decompensated liver cirrhosis. Methods We tasked the LLM to identify five key clinical features of decompensated liver cirrhosis in a zero- and one-shot way without any model training. Our specific objective was to identify abdominal pain, shortness of breath, confusion, liver cirrhosis, and ascites from 500 patient medical histories from the MIMIC IV dataset. We compared LLMs with three different sizes and a variety of pre-specified prompt engineering approaches. Model predictions were compared against the ground truth provided by the consent of three blinded medical experts. Results Our open-source pipeline yielded in highly accurate extraction of quantitative features from medical free text. Clinical features which were explicitly mentioned in the source text, such as liver cirrhosis and ascites, were detected with a sensitivity of 100% and 95% and a specificity of 96% and 95%, respectively from the 70 billion parameter model. Other clinical features, which are often paraphrased in a variety of ways, such as the presence of confusion, were detected only with a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 94%. Abdominal pain was detected with a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 97%. Shortness of breath was detected with a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 96%. The larger version of Llama 2 with 70b parameters outperformed the smaller version with 7b parameters in all tasks. Prompt engineering improved zero-shot performance, particularly for smaller model sizes. Conclusion Our study successfully demonstrates the capability of using locally deployed LLMs to extract clinical information from free text. The hardware requirements are so low that not only on-premise, but also point-of-care deployment of LLMs are possible.

Leveraging Large Language Models for Medical Information Extraction and Query Generation

Improving Clinical Expertise in Large Language Models Using Electronic Medical Records

Learning to match patients to clinical trials using large language models

Distilling large language models for matching patients to clinical trials

Large Language Models for Healthcare Data Augmentation: An Example on Patient-Trial Matching

Large language models encode clinical knowledge

A Study of Generative Large Language Model for Medical Research and Healthcare

End-To-End Clinical Trial Matching with Large Language Models

Benchmarking Large Language Models in Evidence-Based Medicine

Large language models in medical and healthcare fields: applications, advances, and challenges

Evaluating large language models in medical applications: a survey

Enhancing Biomarker-Based Oncology Trial Matching Using Large Language Models

Scaling Clinical Trial Matching Using Large Language Models: A Case Study in Oncology

From Text to Tables: A Local Privacy Preserving Large Language Model for Structured Information Retrieval from Medical Documents

Large language models in healthcare and medical domain: A review

Privacy-preserving large language models for structured medical information retrieval

Answering real-world clinical questions using large language model based systems

Large Language Models in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Benchmark

Large language models for biomedicine: foundations, opportunities, challenges, and best practices