Abstract:Natural language processing (NLP) tools have the potential to boost civic participation and enhance democratic processes because they can significantly increase governments' capacity to gather and analyze citizen opinions. However, their adoption in government remains limited, and harnessing their benefits while preventing unintended consequences remains a challenge. While prior work has focused on improving NLP performance, this work examines how different internal government stakeholders influence NLP tools' thoughtful adoption. We interviewed seven politicians (politically appointed officials as heads of government institutions) and thirteen public servants (career government employees who design and administrate policy interventions), inquiring how they choose whether and how to use NLP tools to support civic participation processes. The interviews suggest that policymakers across both groups focused on their needs for career advancement and the need to showcase the legitimacy and fairness of their work when considering NLP tool adoption and use. Because these needs vary between politicians and public servants, their preferred NLP features and tool designs also differ. Interestingly, despite their differing needs and opinions, neither group clearly identifies who should advocate for NLP adoption to enhance civic participation or address the unintended consequences of a poorly considered adoption. This lack of clarity in responsibility might have caused the governments' low adoption of NLP tools. We discuss how these findings reveal new insights for future HCI research. They inform the design of NLP tools for increasing civic participation efficiency and capacity, the design of other tools and methods that ensure thoughtful adoption of AI tools in government, and the design of NLP tools for collaborative use among users with different incentives and needs.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: How to effectively adopt natural language processing (NLP) tools among different stakeholders within the government (especially politicians and civil servants) to enhance the process of citizens' participation in policy - making. Specifically, the paper explores the following issues: 1. **The decision - making process of politicians and civil servants when considering whether and how to use NLP tools**: - When politicians and civil servants decide whether to adopt NLP tools, they mainly focus on career development needs and work legitimacy. - Due to the different needs of these two groups of people, they also have different preferences for the functions and designs of NLP tools. 2. **Ways to deal with potential risks and challenges**: - The research found that although the two groups of people have different needs and opinions, neither of them can clearly point out who should advocate the adoption of NLP tools to enhance citizen participation or solve the unexpected consequences caused by incomplete adoption. - This unclear situation of responsibility may be one of the reasons for the low adoption rate of NLP tools in the government. 3. **Differences in internal motivation**: - Politicians pay more attention to improving the trust of external stakeholders and managing power dynamics through the use of NLP tools. - Civil servants are more concerned about reducing workload, improving efficiency, and avoiding being replaced. ### Main contributions This paper reveals the complexity and differences among different policy - makers in Latin American countries (such as Chile and Uruguay) when considering the adoption of NLP tools. It provides valuable references for future research, especially in the innovation of NLP tools in the public sector. In addition, this study challenges some common assumptions in the HCI and AI literature about the adoption of government AI tools, that is, the adoption of these tools is not only a matter of algorithm performance or fairness, but also involves complex interactions among different types of policy - makers. ### Conclusion Through this study, the author hopes to provide guidance for the future design of NLP tools and propose new social practices to ensure the deliberate adoption and use of these tools in the government. This will not only help improve the effectiveness and efficiency of citizen participation, but also better deal with potential risks and unexpected consequences.

Thoughtful Adoption of NLP for Civic Participation: Understanding Differences Among Policymakers

Citizen Participation and Machine Learning for a Better Democracy

NLP4Gov: A Comprehensive Library for Computational Policy Analysis

What is civic participation in artificial intelligence?

Deciphering Public Voices in the Digital Era

Ethical Considerations Related to Personal Data Collection and Reuse: Trust and Transparency in Language and Speech Technologies

The Adoption and Implementation of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Public Organizations: Evidence from U.S. State Governments

Studying Up Public Sector AI: How Networks of Power Relations Shape Agency Decisions Around AI Design and Use

What Do Citizens Think of AI Adoption in Public Services? Exploratory Research on Citizen Attitudes through a Social Contract Lens

Toward Community-Based Natural Language Processing (CBNLP): Cocreating With Communities

"It's how you do things that matters": Attending to Process to Better Serve Indigenous Communities with Language Technologies

Participatory Approaches in AI Development and Governance: Case Studies

Evaluating the application of NLP tools in mainstream participatory budgeting processes in Scotland

Lessons Learned from a Citizen Science Project for Natural Language Processing

Public Procurement for Responsible AI? Understanding U.S. Cities' Practices, Challenges, and Needs

Understanding the Determinants in the Different Government AI Adoption Stages: Evidence of Local Government Chatbots in China

Analysing and Organising Human Communications for AI Fairness-Related Decisions: Use Cases from the Public Sector

How Good Is NLP? A Sober Look at NLP Tasks through the Lens of Social Impact

Facilitating Opinion Diversity through Hybrid NLP Approaches

NLP for Maternal Healthcare: Perspectives and Guiding Principles in the Age of LLMs

Aligning Artificial Intelligence with Humans through Public Policy