Abstract:School choice initiatives–which empower parents to choose which schools their children attend–are built on the assumptions that parents know what features of a school are most important to their family and that they are capable of focusing on the most important features when they make their decisions. However, decades of psychological research suggest that decision makers lack metacognitive knowledge of the factors that influence their decisions. We sought to reconcile this discrepancy between the policy assumptions and the psychological research. To do so, we asked participants to complete Choice-Based Conjoint surveys in which they made series of choices between different hypothetical schools. We then asked participants to self-report the weight they placed on each attribute when making their choices. Across four studies, we found that participants did not know how much weight they had placed on various school attributes. Average correlations between stated and revealed weights ranged from r = .34–.54. Stated weights predicted different choices than revealed weights in 16.41–20.63% of decisions. These metacognitive limitations persisted regardless of whether the participants were parents or non-parents (Study 1a/1b), the nature of the attributes that participants used to evaluate alternatives (Study 2), and whether or not decision makers had access to school ratings that could be used as metacognitive aids (Study 3). In line with prior psychological research–and in contract to policy assumptions–these findings demonstrate that decision makers do not have particularly strong metacognitive knowledge of the factors that influence their school choice decisions. As a result, parents making school choice decisions are likely to seek out and use the wrong information, thus leading to suboptimal school choices. Future research should replicate these results in more ecologically valid samples and test new approaches to school choice that account for these metacognitive limitations.

Knowledge and Freedom: Evidence on the Relationship Between Information and Paternalism

Paternalism for rational agents

The political economy of paternalism

Paternalism, Autonomy, or Both? Experimental Evidence from Energy Saving Programs

Controlling Influences

Biases and Heuristics in Decision Making and Their Impact on Autonomy

Children, Paternalism and the Development of Autonomy

Heuristics and Public Policy: Decision Making Under Bounded Rationality

Heuristics and Public Policy: Decision-making Under Bounded Rationality

Self-Authorship, Well-being and Paternalism

Rationality and Decisional Autonomy

Parental rights or parental wrongs: Parents’ metacognitive knowledge of the factors that influence their school choice decisions

A definition of paternalism

How experimental methods shaped views on human competence and rationality.

An experimental investigation into whether choice architecture interventions are considered ethical

The effect of an experimental veil of ignorance on intergenerational resource sharing: empirical evidence from a sequential multi-person dictator game

Understanding Autonomy: An Urgent Intervention

Autonomy and paternalism in medical e-commerce

Expert knowledge and the administrative state

To Trust or to Think: Cognitive Forcing Functions Can Reduce Overreliance on AI in AI-assisted Decision-making