Convergences and Divergences in the 2024 Judicial Reform in Mexico: A Neural Network Analysis of Transparency, Judicial Autonomy, and Public Acceptance

Carlos Medel-Ramírez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12376.71685

2024-09-11

Abstract:This study utilizes neural networks to evaluate the 2024 judicial reform in Mexico, a proposal designed to overhaul the judicial system by increasing transparency, judicial autonomy, and introducing the popular election of judges. The neural network model analyzes both converging and diverging factors that influence the reforms viability and public acceptance. Key areas of convergence include enhanced transparency and judicial autonomy, which are seen as improvements to the system. However, major points of divergence, such as the high costs of implementation and concerns about the legitimacy of electing judges, pose significant challenges. By integrating variables like transparency, decision quality, judicial independence, and implementation costs, the model predicts levels of public and professional acceptance of the reform. The neural networks multilayered structure allows for the modeling of complex relationships, offering predictive insights into how the reform may impact the Mexican judicial system. Initial findings suggest that while the reform could strengthen judicial autonomy, the risks of politicizing the judiciary and the financial burden it entails may reduce its overall acceptance. This research highlights the importance of using advanced AI tools to simulate public policy outcomes, providing valuable data to guide lawmakers in refining their proposals.

Computers and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptance of the Mexican judicial reform in 2024, especially by analyzing the convergences and divergences in it through a neural network model. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects:

1. **Transparency**: Whether increasing the transparency of the judicial process can enhance the public's trust in the judicial system.
2. **Judicial Independence**: Whether the reform measures can effectively guarantee the independence of the judicial organs.
3. **Public Acceptance**: The acceptance degree of the reform measures by the public and legal professionals.
4. **Implementation Costs**: Whether the administrative and financial costs brought by the reform measures are reasonable.
5. **Popular Election of Judges**: Whether the mechanism of judges being elected by the public can ensure the fairness and legality of the judiciary.

### Specific Problem Description

- **Convergences**:
- Increasing Transparency: Ensure that the judicial process is more open and transparent.
- Judicial Independence: Keep the judicial organs operating independently.
- Judge Election: Elect judges in a democratic way to increase the democratic participation in the judicial system.

- **Divergences**:
- Legality and Quality of Judge Election: There are concerns that the election may lead to inexperienced candidates being elected, affecting the quality of the judiciary.
- Implementation Costs: The costs of electing judges and establishing disciplinary courts may be too high.
- Independence of Disciplinary Courts: Disciplinary courts elected through elections may not be able to maintain their independence.

### Application of Neural Network Model

In order to evaluate the influence of these factors, the paper proposes a three - layer neural network model (input layer, hidden layer, output layer), and its structure is as follows:

- **Input Layer**: It contains 6 variables (transparency, legality, independence, quality, cost, fairness).
- **Hidden Layer**: It contains 10 neurons and uses the ReLU activation function.
- **Output Layer**: One neuron, using the Sigmoid activation function to predict the acceptance of the reform.

### Mathematical Model Representation

1. **Input Variables**:
\[
x_1: \text{Transparency} \\
x_2: \text{Legality} \\
x_3: \text{Independence} \\
x_4: \text{Quality} \\
x_5: \text{Cost} \\
x_6: \text{Fairness}
\]

2. **Hidden Layer Function**:
The output \( z_j \) of each hidden - layer neuron is calculated as:
\[
z_j=\sum_{i = 1}^{6}w_{ij}x_i + b_j
\]
where \( w_{ij} \) is the weight connecting the input \( i \) and the hidden - layer neuron \( j \), and \( b_j \) is the bias of the hidden - layer neuron \( j \).

3. **ReLU Activation Function**:
\[
f(z_j)=\max(0,z_j)
\]

4. **Output Layer Function**:
The predicted value \( y \) of the output layer is calculated as:
\[
y = \sigma\left(\sum_{j = 1}^{10}w_{oj}f(z_j)+b_o\right)
\]
where \( w_{oj} \) is the weight connecting the hidden - layer neuron \( j \) and the output layer, \( b_o \) is the bias of the output layer, and \( \sigma \) is the Sigmoid activation function.

### Conclusion

Through the prediction results of the neural network model, the paper reveals the challenges faced by the Mexican judicial reform in 2024, especially issues such as the judge election mechanism and implementation costs, which may lead to a lower acceptance of the reform.