Abstract:Recent advancements in generative AI, exemplified by ChatGPT, have dramatically transformed how people access information. Despite its powerful capabilities, the benefits it provides may not be equally distributed among individuals - a phenomenon referred to as the digital divide. Building upon prior literature, we propose two forms of digital divide in the generative AI adoption process: (i) the learning divide, capturing individuals' heterogeneous abilities to update their perceived utility of ChatGPT; and (ii) the utility divide, representing differences in individuals' actual utility derived from per use of ChatGPT. To evaluate these two divides, we develop a Bayesian learning model that incorporates demographic heterogeneities in both the utility and signal functions. Leveraging a six-month clickstream dataset, we estimate the model and find significant learning and utility divides across various demographic attributes. Interestingly, lower-educated and non-white individuals derive higher utility gains from ChatGPT but learn about its utility at a slower rate. Furthermore, males, younger individuals, and those with an IT background not only derive higher utility per use from ChatGPT but also learn about its utility more rapidly. Besides, we document a phenomenon termed the belief trap, wherein users underestimate ChatGPT's utility, opt not to use the tool, and consequently lack new experiences to update their perceptions, leading to continued underutilization. Our simulation further demonstrates that the learning divide can significantly affect the probability of falling into the belief trap, another form of the digital divide in adoption outcomes (i.e., outcome divide); however, offering training programs can alleviate the belief trap and mitigate the divide.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is the digital divide problem in the adoption process of generative AI (such as ChatGPT) among different populations. Specifically, the author proposes two forms of digital divide:
1. **Learning Divide**: It refers to the differences in individuals' ability to update their perception of the utility of ChatGPT. Such differences will affect whether individuals continue to use and learn how to use this technology more effectively.
2. **Utility Divide**: It refers to the differences in the utility obtained by individuals when actually using ChatGPT.
To evaluate these two divides, the author developed a Bayesian learning model, which combines demographic heterogeneity and was estimated through a six - month click - stream data set. The study found that different demographic backgrounds have a significant impact on the learning speed and utility acquisition. For example, individuals with lower education levels and non - white individuals obtain higher utility from ChatGPT, but their learning speed is slower; while male, young, and individuals with an IT background not only obtain higher utility from each use but also have a faster learning speed.
In addition, the author also discovered the "belief trap" phenomenon, that is, users underestimate the utility of ChatGPT, choose not to use this tool, and thus lack new experiences to update their views, resulting in continuous low utilization. Simulation results show that the learning divide significantly affects the probability of falling into the belief trap, further exacerbating the digital divide in results. Providing training programs can alleviate the belief trap and reduce this divide.
### Main Research Questions
1. **RQ1 (Learning Divide)**: How do individuals with different demographic backgrounds update their perceived utility of generative AI at different rates?
2. **RQ2 (Utility Divide)**: How does the utility acquisition differ when individuals with different demographic backgrounds choose to use generative AI?
3. **RQ3**: How does the learning divide affect the outcome divide, and how can this difference in outcomes be mitigated through policy interventions?
### Research Contributions
1. Proposed a unified framework for understanding the dynamics of information technology adoption and the digital divide, especially in the context of information uncertainty and learning dynamics.
2. Introduced two new theoretical concepts - the learning divide and the belief trap, providing a new perspective on the barriers to technology adoption.
3. In the emerging generative AI literature, for the first time, documented the differences in utility acquisition and learning ability based on demographic characteristics, and quantified the manifestation of these differences in adoption outcomes through a structural model.
### Practical Significance
- For generative AI providers, the research results emphasize the importance of implementing inclusive design practices to increase the attractiveness of tools to vulnerable users.
- For governments and non - profit organizations, the research results suggest designing training programs and outreach activities for specific populations to reduce information asymmetry and promote more equitable technology adoption.
Through these studies, the author hopes to provide valuable references for future AI technology promotion and policy - making.