Abstract:The centrality plays an important role in many community-detection algorithms, which depend on various kinds of centralities to identify seed vertices of communities first and then expand each of communities based on the seeds to get the resulting community structure. The traditional algorithms always use a single centrality measure to recognize seed vertices from the network, but each centrality measure has both pros and cons when being used in this circumstance; hence seed vertices identified using a single centrality measure might not be the best ones. In this paper, we propose a framework which integrates advantages of various centrality measures to identify the seed vertices from the network based on the TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) multiattribute decision-making technology. We take each of the centrality measures involved as an attribute, rank vertices according to the scores which are calculated for them using TOPSIS, and then take vertices with top ranks as the seeds. To put this framework into practice, we concretize it in this paper by considering four centrality measures as attributes to identify the seed vertices of communities first, then expanding communities by iteratively inserting one unclassified vertex into the community to which its most similar neighbor belongs, and the similarity between them is the largest among all pairs of vertices. After that, we obtain the initial community structure. However, the amount of communities might be much more than they should be, and some communities might be too small to make sense. Therefore, we finally consider a postprocessing procedure to merge some initial communities into larger ones to acquire the resulting community structure. To test the effectiveness of the proposed framework and method, we have performed extensive experiments on both some synthetic networks and some real-world networks; the experimental results show that the proposed method can get better results, and the quality of the detected community structure is much higher than those of competitors.

Beyond One Solution: The Case for a Comprehensive Exploration of Solution Space in Community Detection

Enhancing Stability and Assessing Uncertainty in Community Detection through a Consensus-based Approach

Beyond Asymptotics: Practical Insights into Community Detection in Complex Networks

A Survey on Theoretical Advances of Community Detection in Networks

Dynamic Community Discovery Via Common Subspace Projection

A Unified Community Detection, Visualization and Analysis method

Sifting out communities in large sparse networks

Resolution limit in community detection

Think Locally, Act Locally: The Detection of Small, Medium-Sized, and Large Communities in Large Networks

Community Detection in Networks: a Game-Theoretic Framework

Community extraction for social networks

Exhaustive Exploitation of Local Seeding Algorithms for Community Detection in a Unified Manner

Bridge Bounding: A Local Approach for Efficient Community Discovery in Complex Networks

MultiComm: Finding Community Structurein Multi-Dimensional Networks

Mining Application-aware Community Organization with Expanded Feature Subspaces from Concerned Attributes in Social Networks.

Finding Communities by Their Centers

Improving community detection in social networks using enhanced BSO by exploring network structure

Detecting Statistically Significant Communities.

A Seed-Expanding Method Based on TOPSIS for Community Detection in Complex Networks

Individual-centered Partial Information in Social Networks

Overlapping Community Detection in Complex Networks using Symmetric Binary Matrix Factorization