Abstract:Agent-Based Model (ABM) validation is crucial as it helps ensuring the reliability of simulations, and causal discovery has become a powerful tool in this context. However, current causal discovery methods often face accuracy and robustness challenges when applied to complex and noisy time series data, which is typical in ABM scenarios. This study addresses these issues by proposing a Robust Cross-Validation (RCV) approach to enhance causal structure learning for ABM validation. We develop RCV-VarLiNGAM and RCV-PCMCI, novel extensions of two prominent causal discovery algorithms. These aim to reduce the impact of noise better and give more reliable causal relation results, even with high-dimensional, time-dependent data. The proposed approach is then integrated into an enhanced ABM validation framework, which is designed to handle diverse data and model structures. The approach is evaluated using synthetic datasets and a complex simulated fMRI dataset. The results demonstrate greater reliability in causal structure identification. The study examines how various characteristics of datasets affect the performance of established causal discovery methods. These characteristics include linearity, noise distribution, stationarity, and causal structure density. This analysis is then extended to the RCV method to see how it compares in these different situations. This examination helps confirm whether the results are consistent with existing literature and also reveals the strengths and weaknesses of the novel approaches. By tackling key methodological challenges, the study aims to enhance ABM validation with a more resilient valuation framework presented. These improvements increase the reliability of model-driven decision making processes in complex systems analysis.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problems that this paper attempts to solve mainly focus on the following aspects: 1. **Insufficient Robustness of Time - Series Causal Discovery Methods**: - Commonly used causal discovery methods at present (such as VAR - LiNGAM and PCMCI) often face challenges in accuracy and robustness when applied to complex and noisy time - series data. These methods are very sensitive to noise and changes in the data, resulting in inconsistent results when applied to different subsets or datasets with slightly different features. This is especially crucial in agent - based model (ABM) validation, because wrong causal relationships may lead to wrong conclusions about the effectiveness of the ABM system and the underlying mechanisms. 2. **Lack of a Comprehensive Understanding of the Influence of Dataset Characteristics**: - Although existing research has explored the influence of specific dataset characteristics, there is still a lack of a comprehensive understanding of how various dataset attributes (such as linear and nonlinear, Gaussian and non - Gaussian noise, stationary and non - stationary, sparse and dense causal structures, etc.) jointly affect the performance of causal discovery methods. This lack limits our ability to select appropriate validation techniques and accurately interpret results, especially when dealing with complex problems. 3. **Limitations of Existing ABM Validation Frameworks**: - Existing ABM validation frameworks have the following problems: - **Insufficient Analysis of Dataset Attributes**: Many frameworks lack comprehensive testing of important dataset attributes (such as linearity and stationarity). - **Limited Selection of Causal Discovery Methods**: Most frameworks rely on a single or limited number of causal discovery methods, which may not achieve the best performance when dealing with different data features or priorities (such as accuracy and efficiency). - **Narrow Range of Performance Evaluation Metrics**: Existing validation frameworks usually only focus on basic similarity tests or limited performance metrics and cannot comprehensively capture model performance, especially in complex financial systems. To solve these problems, the paper proposes a new **Robust Cross - Validation (RCV) Causal Discovery Method** and verifies its effectiveness through extensive experimental evaluation and analysis. In addition, an enhanced **Context - Based ABM Validation Framework** is also developed to improve the overall reliability and adaptability of ABM validation. These improvements aim to improve the accuracy and reliability of ABM validation in complex systems (such as financial markets), thereby enhancing the credibility of the model - based decision - making process.

Robust Time Series Causal Discovery for Agent-Based Model Validation

A Causal-based Framework for Multimodal Multivariate Time Series Validation Enhanced by Unsupervised Deep Learning as an Enabler for Industry 4.0

Optimizing VarLiNGAM for Scalable and Efficient Time Series Causal Discovery

Learning domain-specific causal discovery from time series

Neural Additive Vector Autoregression Models for Causal Discovery in Time Series

DARING: Differentiable Causal Discovery with Residual Independence

Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Prior Causal Knowledge

CausalAgents: A Robustness Benchmark for Motion Forecasting using Causal Relationships

Selecting Robust Features for Machine Learning Applications using Multidata Causal Discovery

Variable-Agnostic Causal Exploration for Reinforcement Learning

Continuous Bayesian Model Selection for Multivariate Causal Discovery

A Genetic Algorithm for Causal Discovery Based on Structural Causal Model.

Enhancing Causal Discovery from Robot Sensor Data in Dynamic Scenarios

Learning Causal Relations in Multivariate Time Series Data

Multi-Agent Causal Discovery Using Large Language Models

Nonlinear Causal Discovery in Time Series

Using Deep Autoregressive Models as Causal Inference Engines

Evaluating Temporal Observation-Based Causal Discovery Techniques Applied to Road Driver Behaviour

Observational and Interventional Causal Learning for Regret-Minimizing Control

Causal Evaluation of Language Models

Discovering Mixtures of Structural Causal Models from Time Series Data