Abstract:In inference problems where the dataset comprises Bernoulli outcomes of paired comparisons, the Bradley–Terry model offers a simple and easily interpreted framework. However, it does not deal easily with chess because of the existence of draws, and the white player advantage. Here I present a new generalization of Bradley–Terry in which a chess game is regarded as a three-way competition between the two players and an entity that wins if the game is drawn. Bradley–Terry is then further generalized to account for the white player advantage by positing a second entity whose strength is added to that of the white player. These techniques afford insight into players' strengths, response to playing black or white, and risk-aversion as manifested by probability of drawing. The likelihood functions arising are easily optimised numerically. I analyse a number of datasets of chess results, including the infamous 1963 World Chess Championships, in which Fischer accused three Soviet players of collusion. I conclude, on the basis of a dataset that includes only the scorelines at the event itself, that the Candidates Tournament (Curaçao 1962) exhibits evidence of collusion (p<10−5), in agreement with previous work. I also present scoreline evidence for the effectiveness of such a drawing cartel: noncollusive games are less detrimental to future play than collusive games (p<10−5).

Most Swiss-system tournaments are unfair: Evidence from chess

The Swiss Gambit

Ranking by pairwise comparisons for Swiss-system tournaments

Random matching in balanced bipartite graphs: The (un)fairness of draw mechanisms used in sports

Fair tournament design: A flaw of the UEFA Euro 2020 qualification

The fairness of transparent constrained assignments: The role of draw order

Quantifying the unfairness of the 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification

Sabotage in dynamic tournaments with heterogeneous contestants: Evidence from European football

A simulation comparison of tournament designs for the World Men's Handball Championships

Tournament schedules and incentives in a double round-robin tournament with four teams

Queen’s Gambit Declined: The Gender-Equality Paradox in Chess Participation Across 160 Countries

Fairness in penalty shootouts: Is it worth using dynamic sequences?

Randomness in Competitions

Making the Rules of Sports Fairer

A comparative study of scoring systems by simulations

The allocation of FIFA World Cup slots based on the ranking of confederations

The UEFA Champions League seeding is not strategy-proof since the 2015/16 season

Overconfidence in Tournaments: Evidence from the Field

A generalization of the Bradley–Terry model for draws in chess with an application to collusion

Multivariate Analysis of Scheduling Fair Competitions

On game psychology: an experiment on the chess board/screen, should you always "do your best", and why the programs with prescribed weaknesses cannot be our good friends?