Navigating the Landscape of Reproducible Research: A Predictive Modeling Approach

Akhil Pandey Akella,Sagnik Ray Choudhury,David Koop,Hamed Alhoori

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3627673.3679831

2024-10-24

Abstract:The reproducibility of scientific articles is central to the advancement of science. Despite this importance, evaluating reproducibility remains challenging due to the scarcity of ground truth data. Predictive models can address this limitation by streamlining the tedious evaluation process. Typically, a paper's reproducibility is inferred based on the availability of artifacts such as code, data, or supplemental information, often without extensive empirical investigation. To address these issues, we utilized artifacts of papers as fundamental units to develop a novel, dual-spectrum framework that focuses on author-centric and external-agent perspectives. We used the author-centric spectrum, followed by the external-agent spectrum, to guide a structured, model-based approach to quantify and assess reproducibility. We explored the interdependencies between different factors influencing reproducibility and found that linguistic features such as readability and lexical diversity are strongly correlated with papers achieving the highest statuses on both spectrums. Our work provides a model-driven pathway for evaluating the reproducibility of scientific research. The code, methods, and artifacts for our study are publicly available at: <a class="link-external link-https" href="https://github.com/reproducibilityproject/NLRR/" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>

Digital Libraries

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the evaluation of paper reproducibility in scientific research. Although reproducibility is crucial for the development of science, the current process of evaluating paper reproducibility is both time - consuming and lacks standardized methods. The paper points out that the existing evaluation methods usually infer the reproducibility based on the presence or absence of the code, data or supplementary information provided by the paper, and these methods often lack in - depth empirical research. Therefore, the author proposes a new predictive modeling method to quantify and evaluate the reproducibility of papers by constructing a bispectral framework (including the author - centered perspective and the external proxy perspective).

Specifically, the paper aims to:

1. **Develop a new type of reproducibility evaluation framework**: This framework combines the author - centered perspective and the external proxy perspective and can evaluate the reproducibility of papers more comprehensively.
2. **Analyze various factors affecting reproducibility**: By extracting features from the paper text and metadata, study the relationship between these features and reproducibility.
3. **Establish an interpretable prediction model**: Use machine - learning techniques to predict the reproducibility of papers, thereby providing a systematic and data - driven method to evaluate the reproducibility of papers.

Through these goals, the paper hopes to provide the scientific community with a more efficient and reliable evaluation method to promote the transparency and reproducibility of scientific research.