Duality between prime factors and the Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions -- II

Krishnaswami Alladi,Jason Johnson
2024-10-24
Abstract:In the first paper under this title (1977), the first author utilized a duality identity between the largest and smallest prime factors involving the Moebius function, to establish the following result as a consequence of the Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions: If $k$ and $\ell$ are positive integers, with $1\le\ell\le k$ and $(\ell, k)=1$, then $$ \sum_{n\ge 2,\, p(n)\equiv\ell(mod\,k)}\frac{\mu(n)}{n}=\frac{-1}{\phi(k)}, $$ where $\mu(n)$ is the Moebius function, $p(n)$ is the smallest prime factor of $n$, and $\phi(k)$ is the Euler function. Here we utilize the next level Duality identity between the second largest prime factor and the smallest prime factor, involving the Moebius function and $\omega(n)$, the number of distinct prime factors of $n$, to establish the following result as a consequence of the Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions: For all $\ell$ and $k$ as above, $$ \sum_{n\ge 2, \, p(n)\equiv\ell(mod\,k)}\frac{\mu(n)\omega(n)}{n}=0. $$ A quantitative version of this result is proved.
Number Theory
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is about the dual relationship between the Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions (PNTAP) and prime factors. Specifically, by introducing the duality identity between the second - largest prime factor and the smallest prime factor, the author further explores the applications of these dualities in PNTAP and proves some new results. ### Main problem description 1. **Applications of duality identities**: - The author uses the duality identity between the second - largest prime factor \(P_2(n)\) and the smallest prime factor \(p(n)\), combined with the Möbius function \(\mu(n)\) and different functions \(f\), to study the prime distribution in arithmetic progressions of these duality identities. - Specifically, the author studies the duality identities in the following forms: \[ \sum_{1 < d|n}\mu(d)f(P_k(d))=(- 1)^k\binom{\omega(n)-1}{k - 1}f(p_1(n)) \] \[ \sum_{1 < d|n}\mu(d)f(p_k(d))=(- 1)^k\binom{\omega(n)-1}{k - 1}f(P_1(n)) \] where \(\omega(n)\) represents the number of distinct prime factors of \(n\), and \(P_k(n)\) and \(p_k(n)\) represent the \(k\)-th largest and \(k\)-th smallest prime factors of \(n\) respectively. 2. **Proofs of main results**: - The author proves that when \(k = 2\), the second - largest prime factor \(P_2(n)\) is uniformly distributed in the reduced residue classes modulo \(k\). That is, for any positive integer \(k\) and an integer \(\ell\) satisfying \((\ell,k)=1\), we have: \[ N_2(x,k,\ell):=\sum_{n\leq x,P_2(n)\equiv\ell\pmod{k}}1=\frac{x}{\varphi(k)}+O\left(\frac{x(\log\log x)^2}{\log x}\right) \] - Using this result, the author further proves the following main result: \[ \sum_{n\geq2,p_1(n)\equiv\ell\pmod{k}}\frac{\mu(n)\omega(n)}{n}=0 \] ### Summary The core problem of this paper is to study the prime distribution in arithmetic progressions by introducing more complex duality identities, especially those involving the second - largest prime factor \(P_2(n)\), and to prove the results that these prime factors are uniformly distributed in the reduced residue classes modulo \(k\). Finally, the author uses these results to prove an important identity regarding the Möbius function and the prime factor number function \(\omega(n)\).