Abstract:In this paper, we propose a model for building natural language explanations for Bayesian Network Reasoning in terms of factor arguments, which are argumentation graphs of flowing evidence, relating the observed evidence to a target variable we want to learn about. We introduce the notion of factor argument independence to address the outstanding question of defining when arguments should be presented jointly or separately and present an algorithm that, starting from the evidence nodes and a target node, produces a list of all independent factor arguments ordered by their strength. Finally, we implemented a scheme to build natural language explanations of Bayesian Reasoning using this approach. Our proposal has been validated in the medical domain through a human-driven evaluation study where we compare the Bayesian Network Reasoning explanations obtained using factor arguments with an alternative explanation method. Evaluation results indicate that our proposed explanation approach is deemed by users as significantly more useful for understanding Bayesian Network Reasoning than another existing explanation method it is compared to.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: how to provide natural - language explanations for the inference process of Bayesian Networks (BNs), enabling users to better understand the causal relationships and inference paths in BNs. Specifically, the author proposes a method based on factor arguments, constructing natural - language explanations to help users understand the inference process from evidence nodes to target nodes.
### Problem Background
Bayesian Networks are a powerful tool for representing uncertainty and causal relationships, and are widely used in many fields such as medicine and law. However, understanding and explaining the inference process of BNs is a complex and difficult task for non - expert users. Especially in critical fields such as medicine, explaining the inference process of the model is crucial for building trust.
### Core Contributions of the Paper
1. **The Concept of Factor Arguments**:
- Introduced "factor arguments", which is an argument graph describing the flow of evidence, linking the observed evidence to the target variable.
- Defined factor argument independence to determine which arguments should be presented to the user jointly or separately.
2. **Algorithm Implementation**:
- Proposed an algorithm to generate all independent factor arguments starting from evidence nodes and target nodes and rank them according to their strength.
- The algorithm takes into account the specific inference paths from evidence nodes to target nodes, thus helping users understand the causal chains in BNs.
3. **Natural - Language Explanation**:
- Developed a scheme to construct natural - language explanations for Bayesian inference using the above - mentioned methods.
- In this way, users can more intuitively understand the inference process of BNs, rather than just seeing the final probability update results.
4. **Experimental Verification**:
- Conducted a human - evaluation study in the medical field, comparing the explanations generated by the factor - argument method with those of another existing explanation method.
- The experimental results show that users consider the new method more useful in understanding Bayesian - network inference.
### Formula Summary
- **Factor Argument Effect (FAE)**:
\[
\delta_X = FAE(FA, X)=\prod_{\varphi \in Pred_{FA}(X)} SE(\varphi, \Delta_\varphi, X)
\]
where $\Delta_\varphi =\{\delta_Y: Y\in Pred_{FA}(\varphi)\}$ is the set of belief updates for each predecessor node.
- **Factor Argument Strength (FAS)**:
\[
FAS(FA, T = t_o)=\log\frac{\delta_T(t_o)}{\frac{1}{N - 1}\sum_{i\neq o}\delta_T(t_i)}
\]
where $N$ is the number of possible states of the target variable $T$, $\delta_T(t_o)$ is the influence of the factor argument on the value $t_o$ of the target variable, and $\delta_T(t_i)$ is the influence on other states.
- **Factor Argument Distance (FAD)**:
\[
FAD(\delta^a_T, \delta^b_T)=\max_{i < N}\left|\log\frac{\delta^a/b_T(t_i)}{\frac{1}{N - 1}\sum_{j\neq i}\delta^a/b_T(t_j)}\right|
\]
where $\delta^a/b_T(t_i)$ represents $\delta^a_T(t_i)/\delta^b_T(t_i)$.
Through these methods and formulas, the paper proposes...