Abstract:We apply two approximate solutions of the quantum-classical Liouville equation (QCLE) in the mapping representation to the simulation of the laser-induced response of a quantum subsystem coupled to a classical environment. These solutions, known as the Poisson Bracket Mapping Equation (PBME) and the Forward-Backward (FB) trajectory solutions, involve simple algorithms in which the dynamics of both the quantum and classical degrees of freedom are described in terms of continuous variables, as opposed to standard surface-hopping solutions in which the classical degrees of freedom hop between potential energy surfaces dictated by the discrete adiabatic state of the quantum subsystem. The validity of these QCLE-based solutions is tested on a non-trivial electron transfer model involving more than two quantum states, a time-dependent Hamiltonian, strong subsystem-bath coupling, and an initial energy shift between the donor and acceptor states that depends on the strength of the subsystem-bath coupling. In particular, we calculate the time-dependent population of the photoexcited donor state in response to an ultrafast, on-resonance pump pulse in a three-state model of an electron transfer complex that is coupled asymmetrically to a bath of harmonic oscillators through the optically dark acceptor state. Within this approach, the three-state electron transfer complex is treated quantum mechanically, while the bath oscillators are treated classically. When compared to the more accurate QCLE-based surface-hopping solution and to the numerically exact quantum results, we find that the PBME solution is not capable of qualitatively capturing the population dynamics, whereas the FB solution is. However, when the subsystem-bath coupling is decreased (which also decreases the initial energy shift between the donor and acceptor states) or the initial shift is removed altogether, both the PBME and FB results agree better with the QCLE-based surface-hopping results. These findings highlight the challenges posed by various conditions such as a time-dependent external field, the strength of the subsystem-bath coupling, and the degree of asymmetry on the accuracy of the PBME and FB algorithms. (C) 2013 American Institute of Physics. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4799272]

Learning the dynamics of Markovian open quantum systems from experimental data

Capturing Non-Markovian Dynamics on Near-Term Quantum Computers

Simulation-assisted learning of open quantum systems

Machine learning non-Markovian quantum dynamics

Going beyond quantum Markovianity and back to reality: An exact master equation study

Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems

Automated quantum system modeling with machine learning

Quantum Algorithm for Simulating the Dynamics of an Open Quantum System

Inferring interpretable dynamical generators of local quantum observables from projective measurements through machine learning

A Mixed Quantum-Classical Liouville Study Of The Population Dynamics In A Model Photo-Induced Condensed Phase Electron Transfer Reaction

Quantifying spectral signatures of non-Markovianity beyond the Born-Redfield master equation

Fitting quantum noise models to tomography data

Fitting time-dependent Markovian dynamics to noisy quantum channels

Efficient simulation of sparse Markovian quantum dynamics

A quantum algorithm to simulate Lindblad master equations

Simulating Markovian open quantum systems using higher-order series expansion

Optimized Bayesian system identification in quantum devices

Dynamics of Open Quantum Systems II, Markovian Approximation

Designing open quantum systems with known steady states: Davies generators and beyond

Post-Markovian master equation à la microscopic collisional model

Markovian Embeddings of Non-Markovian Quantum Systems: Coupled Stochastic and Quantum Master Equations for Non-Markovian Quantum Systems