Abstract:Differential privacy (DP), as a rigorous mathematical definition quantifying privacy leakage, has become a well-accepted standard for privacy protection. Combined with powerful machine learning (ML) techniques, differentially private machine learning (DPML) is increasingly important. As the most classic DPML algorithm, DP-SGD incurs a significant loss of utility, which hinders DPML's deployment in practice. Many studies have recently proposed improved algorithms based on DP-SGD to mitigate utility loss. However, these studies are isolated and cannot comprehensively measure the performance of improvements proposed in algorithms. More importantly, there is a lack of comprehensive research to compare improvements in these DPML algorithms across utility, defensive capabilities, and generalizability. We fill this gap by performing a holistic measurement of improved DPML algorithms on utility and defense capability against membership inference attacks (MIAs) on image classification tasks. We first present a taxonomy of where improvements are located in the ML life cycle. Based on our taxonomy, we jointly perform an extensive measurement study of the improved DPML algorithms, over twelve algorithms, four model architectures, four datasets, two attacks, and various privacy budget configurations. We also cover state-of-the-art label differential privacy (Label DP) algorithms in the evaluation. According to our empirical results, DP can effectively defend against MIAs, and sensitivity-bounding techniques such as per-sample gradient clipping play an important role in defense. We also explore some improvements that can maintain model utility and defend against MIAs more effectively. Experiments show that Label DP algorithms achieve less utility loss but are fragile to MIAs. ML practitioners may benefit from these evaluations to select appropriate algorithms. To support our evaluation, we implement a modular re-usable software, DPMLBench,(1) which enables sensitive data owners to deploy DPML algorithms and serves as a benchmark tool for researchers and practitioners.

Differentially Private Learning Needs Better Model Initialization and Self-Distillation

Private Knowledge Transfer via Model Distillation with Generative Adversarial Networks

Differentially Private Knowledge Distillation via Synthetic Text Generation

Fine-Tuning Large Language Models with User-Level Differential Privacy

Differentially Private Language Models Benefit from Public Pre-training

LMO-DP: Optimizing the Randomization Mechanism for Differentially Private Fine-Tuning (Large) Language Models

DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning

Differentially Private Fine-tuning of Language Models

Private Fine-tuning of Large Language Models with Zeroth-order Optimization

Improving Differentially Private Models with Active Learning

Differentially Private Next-Token Prediction of Large Language Models

DPDR: Gradient Decomposition and Reconstruction for Differentially Private Deep Learning

Differentially Private Language Models for Secure Data Sharing

Large Language Models Can Be Strong Differentially Private Learners

An Efficient DP-SGD Mechanism for Large Scale NLP Models

Differentially Private Fine-Tuning of Diffusion Models

Model Conversion via Differentially Private Data-Free Distillation

Differentially Private Distributed Learning for Language Modeling Tasks

Differentially Private Zeroth-Order Methods for Scalable Large Language Model Finetuning

Adaptively Private Next-Token Prediction of Large Language Models

Improving Differentially Private SGD via Randomly Sparsified Gradients