My H Dinh,James Kotary,Lauryn P. Gouldin,William Yeoh,Ferdinando Fioretto
Abstract:Criminal courts across the United States handle millions of cases every year, and the scheduling of those cases must accommodate a diverse set of constraints, including the preferences and availability of courts, prosecutors, and defense teams. When criminal court schedules are formed, defendants' scheduling preferences often take the least priority, although defendants may face significant consequences (including arrest or detention) for missed court dates. Additionally, studies indicate that defendants' nonappearances impose costs on the courts and other system stakeholders. To address these issues, courts and commentators have begun to recognize that pretrial outcomes for defendants and for the system would be improved with greater attention to court processes, including \emph{court scheduling practices}. There is thus a need for fair criminal court pretrial scheduling systems that account for defendants' preferences and availability, but the collection of such data poses logistical challenges. Furthermore, optimizing schedules fairly across various parties' preferences is a complex optimization problem, even when such data is available. In an effort to construct such a fair scheduling system under data uncertainty, this paper proposes a joint optimization and learning framework that combines machine learning models trained end-to-end with efficient matching algorithms. This framework aims to produce court scheduling schedules that optimize a principled measure of fairness, balancing the availability and preferences of all parties.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to create a fair court scheduling system in the pretrial process of U.S. criminal courts, taking into account the preferences and availability of defendants. Specifically, the paper aims to:
1. **Optimize the fairness of the scheduling system**: Current court scheduling systems usually do not attach importance to the scheduling preferences of defendants, which may lead to defendants missing court hearing dates and then facing serious consequences such as arrest or detention. In addition, the absence of defendants will bring additional costs to the court and other relevant parties. Therefore, a fair scheduling system that can balance the needs and preferences of all parties (including judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and defendants) is required.
2. **Handle data uncertainty and complexity**: There are logistical and technical challenges in collecting the scheduling preference data of defendants. Even with this data, how to fairly optimize among the different preferences of multiple parties is also a complex optimization problem. The paper proposes a joint optimization and learning framework that combines machine - learning models and efficient matching algorithms to address these challenges.
3. **Improve judicial efficiency and social benefits**: Through a more fair scheduling system, the absence rate of defendants can be reduced, thereby reducing the cost of the judicial system and improving judicial efficiency. This also has a positive impact on society as a whole, especially for defendants with poor economic conditions and ethnic minorities, who often face more obstacles to appearing in court.
### Specific contributions of the paper
To achieve the above - mentioned goals, the paper has made the following important contributions:
1. **Formalize the fair scheduling problem**: The scheduling problem is formalized as a nonlinear integer programming problem, and its objective function is a piecewise fairness measure defined based on uncertain defendant scheduling preference data. This formalization method addresses the practical challenges of courts in obtaining reliable preference data.
2. **Propose a novel framework**: Integrate machine learning and optimization techniques to directly optimize the decision - loss function to deal with the uncertainty of defendants' preferences, thereby improving the robustness and fairness of scheduling results.
3. **End - to - end trainable model**: Propose an end - to - end trainable model to predict feasible scheduling schemes through efficient matching algorithm parameters. This enables direct training for fairness goals, enhancing the satisfaction and extensibility of fairness goals.
4. **Generate synthetic datasets**: Due to the lack of real - court - scheduling datasets containing sensitive information (such as gender, race, parenting responsibilities, etc.), the paper introduces a process of generating realistic synthetic datasets. This process is based on the available demographic information of the arrested population and combined with estimates of the number of specific types of obstacles, ensuring that the fairness - aware scheduling models for training and validation can take into account diverse sensitive population factors.
### Summary
In general, this paper is committed to building a criminal - court - scheduling system that can optimize fairness, especially in the face of data uncertainty and complex optimization problems. By combining machine - learning and optimization techniques, the paper provides an innovative solution to improve the efficiency and fairness of the judicial system, reduce the absence rate of defendants, and reduce related costs.