Abstract:One approach to testing general relativity (GR) introduces free parameters in the post-Newtonian (PN) expansion of the gravitational-wave (GW) phase. If systematic errors on these testing GR (TGR) parameters exceed the statistical errors, this may signal a false violation of GR. Here, we consider systematic errors produced by unmodeled binary eccentricity. Since the eccentricity of GW events in ground-based detectors is expected to be small or negligible, the use of quasicircular waveform models for testing GR may be safe when analyzing a small number of events. However, as the catalog size of GW detections increases, more stringent bounds on GR deviations can be placed by combining information from multiple events. In that case, even small systematic biases may become significant. We apply the approach of hierarchical Bayesian inference to model the posterior probability distributions of the TGR parameters inferred from a population of eccentric binary black holes (BBHs). We assume each TGR parameter value varies across the BBH population according to a Gaussian distribution. The means and standard deviations that parametrize these Gaussians are related to the statistical and systematic errors measured for each BBH event. We compute the posterior distributions for these Gaussian hyperparameters , characterizing the BBH population via three possible eccentricity distributions. This is done for LIGO and Cosmic Explorer (CE, a proposed third-generation detector). We find that systematic biases from unmodeled eccentricity can signal false GR violations for both detectors when considering constraints set by a catalog of events. We also compute the projected bounds on the 10 TGR parameters when eccentricity is included as a parameter in the waveform model. This is done via multiplying the individual likelihoods for each event in the catalog, and also by combining them via hierarchical inference. We find that the first four dimensionless TGR deformation parameters can be bounded at 90% confidence to δφ^i≲10−2 for LIGO and ≲10−3 for CE [where i=(0,1,2,3) ; GR predicts zero for all values of the δφ^i ]. The most stringent bound applies to the −1PN (dipole) parameter: it is constrained to |δφ^−2|≲10−5 ( ≲4×10−7 ) by LIGO (CE). In comparison to the circular orbit case, the combined bounds on the TGR parameters worsen by a modest factor of ≲2 when eccentricity is included in the waveform. (The dipole parameter bound degrades by a factor of ∼3–4 in this case). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.084056 © 2024 American Physical Society

Accounting for Numerical-Relativity Calibration Uncertainty in Gravitational-Wave Modeling and Inference

Incorporating waveform calibration error in gravitational-wave modeling and inference for SEOBNRv4

Waveform accuracy and systematic uncertainties in current gravitational wave observations

Systematic Biases in Estimating the Properties of Black Holes Due to Inaccurate Gravitational-Wave Models

Calibrating approximate Bayesian credible intervals of gravitational-wave parameters

Accurate waveform models for gravitational-wave astrophysics: synergetic approaches from analytical relativity

Accuracy limitations of existing numerical relativity waveforms on the data analysis of current and future ground-based detectors

Growing Pains: Understanding the Impact of Likelihood Uncertainty on Hierarchical Bayesian Inference for Gravitational-Wave Astronomy

Systematic bias from waveform modeling for binary black hole populations in next-generation gravitational wave detectors

Catalog variance of testing general relativity with gravitational-wave data

Astrophysical systematics on testing general relativity with gravitational waves from galactic double white dwarfs

Impact of gravitational waveform model systematics on the measurement of the Hubble constant

Calibrating gravitational-wave search algorithms with conformal prediction

Eccentricity-induced systematic error on parametrized tests of general relativity: Hierarchical Bayesian inference applied to a binary black hole population

Measuring violations of General Relativity from single gravitational wave detection by non-spinning binary systems: higher-order asymptotic analysis

Assessing the model waveform accuracy of gravitational waves

Actively Learning Numerical Relativity