The Social Cost of Growth: Evaluating GMV-Centric and Welfare-Centric Strategies in Online Food Delivery Platforms

Yukun Zhang
2024-10-22
Abstract:This paper develops a comprehensive theoretical framework to analyze the trade-offs between Gross Merchandise Volume (GMV) maximization and social welfare optimization in online food delivery platforms. Using a multi-agent simulation and a dual-model approach based on two-sided market theory and welfare economics, we evaluate the impact of GMV-centric and welfare-centric strategies on platform dynamics, including pricing mechanisms, stakeholder welfare, and market efficiency. Our results show that GMV maximization strategies drive rapid short-term transaction growth but lead to uneven welfare distribution, particularly disadvantaging delivery workers. In contrast, welfare-centric strategies promote a more balanced and equitable distribution of benefits among consumers, restaurants, and delivery workers, enhancing platform sustainability in the long run. These findings provide actionable insights for platform operators and policymakers to design strategies that balance growth with social welfare, ensuring both economic efficiency and fairness.
Computer Science and Game Theory,Computers and Society
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **the trade - off between maximizing the Gross Merchandise Volume (GMV) and optimizing the overall social welfare on online food - delivery platforms**. Specifically, the paper explores the impacts of these two strategies on platform dynamics, pricing mechanisms, the welfare of various stakeholders, and market efficiency. ### Specific description of the problem: 1. **Problems with the GMV - maximization strategy**: - **Short - term growth and long - term sustainability**: Although the GMV - maximization strategy can drive rapid transaction growth in the short term, it may lead to uneven welfare distribution, especially unfavorable to delivery workers. - **Impacts on stakeholders**: - **Restaurants**: May face a shrinking profit margin because high commissions and forced discounts increase costs. - **Consumers**: Although they enjoy lower prices, they may encounter problems such as a decline in service quality and an extension of service time. - **Delivery workers**: Their workload increases, but their income does not increase correspondingly, resulting in deteriorated working conditions. 2. **Advantages of the social - welfare - maximization strategy**: - **More balanced welfare distribution**: This strategy promotes a more balanced and fair distribution of interests among consumers, restaurants, and delivery workers. - **Long - term sustainability of the platform**: By ensuring the interests of all participants, it enhances the long - term sustainability and stability of the platform. ### Research objectives: - **Construct utility functions**: Construct utility functions for each stakeholder group (restaurants, consumers, delivery workers) that reflect their preferences and constraints. - **Derive optimal strategies**: Derive the optimal strategies of the platform under the two objectives of GMV - maximization and social - welfare - maximization. - **Compare strategy impacts**: Analyze the impacts of these strategies on participant utility, market efficiency, and resource allocation. - **Evaluate sustainability and ethical considerations**: Evaluate the sustainability and ethical impacts of each strategy. ### Main contributions: Through mathematical models and multi - agent simulation methods, the paper provides practical insights on how to strike a balance between rapid growth and fair distribution, helping platform operators and policymakers design strategies that can promote economic growth while ensuring fairness. ### Summary: This research aims to fill the gap in the existing literature regarding the trade - off between GMV - maximization and social - welfare - optimization, providing a comprehensive framework for analyzing the management strategies of online food - delivery platforms to ensure both economic efficiency and fairness.