Abstract:In this article, we seek to elucidate challenges and opportunities for differential privacy within the federal government setting, as seen by a team of differential privacy researchers, privacy lawyers, and data scientists working closely with the U.S. government. After introducing differential privacy, we highlight three significant challenges which currently restrict the use of differential privacy in the U.S. government. We then provide two examples where differential privacy can enhance the capabilities of government agencies. The first example highlights how the quantitative nature of differential privacy allows policy security officers to release multiple versions of analyses with different levels of privacy. The second example, which we believe is a novel realization, indicates that differential privacy can be used to improve staffing efficiency in classified applications. We hope that this article can serve as a nontechnical resource which can help frame future action from the differential privacy community, privacy regulators, security officers, and lawmakers.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the challenges and opportunities faced by the US federal government when adopting differential privacy technology. Specifically, the paper mainly focuses on the following aspects: 1. **Definition and Background of Differential Privacy**: Differential privacy is a privacy - protecting algorithmic framework. It ensures the security of individual data by adding noise to the data. It can quantify privacy risks and provide statistical privacy guarantees, making published statistical data, synthetic data sets, and even machine - learning models unable to be reverse - engineered to identify individuals in the source data set. 2. **Challenges in the Federal Government's Implementation of Differential Privacy**: - **Lack of Awareness**: Many government project managers lack an understanding of differential privacy. Traditional privacy protection methods (such as record anonymization, removing sensitive attributes, etc.) are simple but vulnerable to attacks. - **Deployment Difficulties**: Differential privacy is complex to apply in multi - objective tasks and intermediate calculations, and is prone to the risk of privacy leakage. - **Unclear Guidance**: Government security officials are cautious about using differential privacy due to the lack of official approval and specific guidance. 3. **Opportunities for the Application of Differential Privacy**: - **Release Different Versions of Data According to Trust Levels**: Government agencies can release different versions of data or models according to different privacy requirements. For example, medical data can provide a more accurate version for doctors and a more privacy - protected version for researchers and insurance companies. - **Improve Efficiency in a Classification Environment**: When dealing with highly confidential data, using differential privacy can reduce the confidentiality level required for certain positions, thereby reducing time and cost and improving efficiency. 4. **Recommendations for Future Actions**: - Develop effective communication methods to help decision - makers understand the privacy guarantees of differential privacy. - Research how to apply differential privacy to large, unstructured data sets. - Narrow the gap between theoretical research and practical deployment. - Develop a framework for evaluating, accepting, and deploying differential privacy systems. In summary, the paper aims to explore the current application status of differential privacy in the US federal government, analyze the challenges it faces, and propose possible solutions and future research directions to promote the wide application of differential privacy in government data processing.

Position: Challenges and Opportunities for Differential Privacy in the U.S. Federal Government

Differential Privacy for Government Agencies -- Are We There Yet?

Issues Encountered Deploying Differential Privacy

Practical Considerations for Differential Privacy

Centering Policy and Practice: Research Gaps around Usable Differential Privacy

What to Consider When Considering Differential Privacy for Policy

Non-Interactive Differential Privacy: a Survey

Differential Privacy in the 2020 Decennial Census and the Implications for Available Data Products

Advancing Differential Privacy: Where We Are Now and Future Directions for Real-World Deployment

Balancing data privacy and usability in the federal statistical system

Differential Privacy in Privacy-Preserving Big Data and Learning: Challenge and Opportunity

"I need a better description'': An Investigation Into User Expectations For Differential Privacy

Impacts of Differential Privacy on Fostering more Racially and Ethnically Diverse Elementary Schools

Privacy-Preserving Data Analysis for the Federal Statistical Agencies

Incompatibilities Between Current Practices in Statistical Data Analysis and Differential Privacy

Differential Privacy Made Easy

Decision Making with Differential Privacy under a Fairness Lens

The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy

Do I Get the Privacy I Need? Benchmarking Utility in Differential Privacy Libraries

Differential Privacy and Machine Learning: a Survey and Review

More Than Privacy: Applying Differential Privacy in Key Areas of Artificial Intelligence