Grid-Forming Control of Modular Dynamic Virtual Power Plants

Xiuqiang He,Josué Duarte,Verena Häberle,Florian Dörfler

2024-10-19

Abstract:This article explores a flexible and coordinated control design for an aggregation of heterogeneous distributed energy resources (DERs) in a dynamic virtual power plant (DVPP). The control design aims to provide a desired aggregate grid-forming (GFM) response based on the coordination of power contributions between different DERs. Compared to existing DVPP designs with an AC-coupled AC-output configuration, a more generic modular DVPP design is proposed in this article, which comprises four types of basic DVPP modules, involving AC- or DC-coupling and AC- or DC-output, adequately accommodating diverse DER integration setups, such as AC, DC, AC/DC hybrid microgrids and renewable power plants. The control design is first developed for the four basic modules by the aggregation of DERs and the disaggregation of the control objectives, and then extended to modular DVPPs through a systematic top-down approach. The control performance is comprehensively validated through simulation. The modular DVPP design offers scalable and standardizable advanced grid interfaces (AGIs) for building and operating AC/DC hybrid power grids.

Systems and Control

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problems that this paper attempts to solve are the challenges brought by the integration of Distributed Energy Resources (DERs) in modern power systems, especially the energy conversion and control requirements of these DERs under different configurations. Specifically, the paper aims to design a flexible and coordinated control method to achieve the Grid - Forming (GFM) response of the Dynamic Virtual Power Plant (DVPP). The following are the key problems that the paper attempts to solve:

1. **Diverse DER integration configurations**: DERs are integrated into various settings, including AC (alternating current), DC (direct current) and AC - DC hybrid systems. Each configuration requires different forms of energy conversion.

2. **Diverse control objectives**: Due to the diversity of primary energy sources, each type of DER usually needs to set different control objectives on different time scales according to its power and energy capabilities.

3. **Dynamic response requirements**: Effective control strategies must meet specific dynamic response requirements, such as Fast Frequency Response (FFR), which are stipulated by grid codes, ancillary service markets or optimal specification standards.

4. **Limitations of existing control methods**:
- Existing methods may lack flexibility and be unable to provide the required aggregated response to the output - side grid.
- Existing control designs are usually custom - made and difficult to be extended to adapt to AC - DC hybrid systems.

To address these challenges, the paper proposes a more general modular DVPP design, which contains four basic DVPP modules, involving AC or DC coupling and AC or DC output. In this way, a variety of DER integration settings, such as AC, DC, AC - DC hybrid micro - grids and renewable energy power plants, can be fully accommodated.

### Main contributions of the paper
- Proposed four basic DVPP configurations/modules, representing the typical topologies in current DER integration practices, and formulated the desired interoperability control objectives for each module.
- Proposed control designs for each basic DVPP module, including DER aggregation conditions, coordinated decomposition of desired behaviors, and local control strategies for individual converters.
- Extended this control design to the modular AC - DC hybrid DVPP, providing a modular DVPP solution with high flexibility and scalability through a systematic top - down design method.

### Formula representation
The formulas involved in the paper are presented in Markdown format, for example:

- The transfer function of the AC GFM response is represented as:
\[
\begin{bmatrix}
\Delta f(s) \\
\Delta v(s)
\end{bmatrix} =
\begin{bmatrix}
T_{fp}^{des}(s) & 0 \\
0 & T_{vq}^{des}(s)
\end{bmatrix}
\begin{bmatrix}
\partial p(s) \\
\Delta q(s)
\end{bmatrix}
\]

- The relationship between the DC voltage squared change and the AC - side perturbation is represented as:
\[
\Delta(v^2_{dc})(s) = T_{vdcf}^{des}(s)\Delta f(s)
\]

- The power response of a single DER to the DC voltage change is represented as:
\[
\Delta p_i(s) = T_i(s)\Delta(v^2_{dc})(s)
\]

Through these formulas, the paper describes in detail how to achieve the desired GFM response by coordinating the behaviors of individual DERs.