Abstract:The problem of visual question answering (VQA) is of significant importance both as a challenging research question and for the rich set of applications it enables. In this context, however, inherent structure in our world and bias in our language tend to be a simpler signal for learning than visual modalities, resulting in VQA models that ignore visual information, leading to an inflated sense of their capability. We propose to counter these language priors for the task of VQA and make vision (the V in VQA) matter! Specifically, we balance the popular VQA dataset (Antol et al., in: ICCV, 2015) by collecting complementary images such that every question in our balanced dataset is associated with not just a single image, but rather a pair of similar images that result in two different answers to the question. Our dataset is by construction more balanced than the original VQA dataset and has approximately twice the number of image-question pairs. Our complete balanced dataset is publicly available at http://visualqa.org/ as part of the 2nd iteration of the VQA Dataset and Challenge (VQA v2.0). We further benchmark a number of state-of-art VQA models on our balanced dataset. All models perform significantly worse on our balanced dataset, suggesting that these models have indeed learned to exploit language priors. This finding provides the first concrete empirical evidence for what seems to be a qualitative sense among practitioners. We also present interesting insights from analysis of the participant entries in VQA Challenge 2017, organized by us on the proposed VQA v2.0 dataset. The results of the challenge were announced in the 2nd VQA Challenge Workshop at the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2017. Finally, our data collection protocol for identifying complementary images enables us to develop a novel interpretable model, which in addition to providing an answer to the given (image, question) pair, also provides a counter-example based explanation. Specifically, it identifies an image that is similar to the original image, but it believes has a different answer to the same question. This can help in building trust for machines among their users.

Help Me Identify: Is an LLM+VQA System All We Need to Identify Visual Concepts?

Simple and Effective Visual Question Answering in a Single Modality

Overcoming Language Priors In Vqa Via Decomposed Linguistic Representations

Good Questions Help Zero-Shot Image Reasoning

Are VLMs Really Blind

Detect, Describe, Discriminate: Moving Beyond VQA for MLLM Evaluation

From Images to Textual Prompts: Zero-Shot Visual Question Answering with Frozen Large Language Models

Can Language Models Understand Physical Concepts?

Probing Conceptual Understanding of Large Visual-Language Models

Right this way: Can VLMs Guide Us to See More to Answer Questions?

Pre-trained Vision-Language Models Learn Discoverable Visual Concepts

Language Guided Visual Question Answering: Elevate Your Multimodal Language Model Using Knowledge-Enriched Prompts

The VQA-Machine: Learning How to Use Existing Vision Algorithms to Answer New Questions

Plug-and-Play VQA: Zero-shot VQA by Conjoining Large Pretrained Models with Zero Training

IllusionVQA: A Challenging Optical Illusion Dataset for Vision Language Models

VQA: Visual Question Answering

Visual Superordinate Abstraction for Robust Concept Learning

Visual Mind: Visual Question Answering (VQA) with CLIP Model

Enhancing Visual Question Answering through Question-Driven Image Captions as Prompts

Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answering