Abstract:Data embeddings with CLIP and ImageBind provide powerful features for the analysis of multimedia and/or multimodal data. We assess their performance here for classification using a Gaussian Mixture models (GMMs) based layer as an alternative to the standard Softmax layer. GMMs based classifiers have recently been shown to have interesting performances as part of deep learning pipelines trained end-to-end. Our first contribution is to investigate GMM based classification performance taking advantage of the embedded spaces CLIP and ImageBind. Our second contribution is in proposing our own GMM based classifier with a lower parameters count than previously proposed. Our findings are, that in most cases, on these tested embedded spaces, one gaussian component in the GMMs is often enough for capturing each class, and we hypothesize that this may be due to the contrastive loss used for training these embedded spaces that naturally concentrates features together for each class. We also observed that ImageBind often provides better performance than CLIP for classification of image datasets even when these embedded spaces are compressed using PCA.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate and improve the performance of classifiers based on Gaussian Mixture Models (GMMs) in the embedded feature space, especially compared with the traditional Softmax layer. Specifically, the author mainly focuses on the following aspects:
1. **Evaluating the classification performance of CLIP and ImageBind embedding spaces**:
- CLIP and ImageBind are two powerful multi - modal data embedding methods, which can provide strong support for multimedia or cross - modal data analysis. The author hopes to evaluate the performance of these embedding spaces when using GMMs as the classification layer.
2. **Proposing a new GMMs classifier (DGMMC)**:
- The author proposes a new classifier named Deep Gaussian Mixture Model Classifier (DGMMC), which has fewer parameters and can effectively classify in the embedding space. In particular, the DGMMC - S version uses a spherical covariance matrix, which greatly reduces the number of parameters.
3. **Exploring the influence of embedding space characteristics on classification**:
- The research finds that in these tested embedding spaces, usually only one Gaussian component is required for each class to capture its characteristics. This may be due to the contrastive loss function used in training these embedding spaces, which naturally concentrates the features of each class together.
4. **Comparing the effects of different embedding spaces and classifiers**:
- The author experimentally compares the classification effects of CLIP and ImageBind embedding spaces on multiple image datasets, and the results show that ImageBind is generally superior to CLIP. In addition, DGMMC - S performs excellently in most cases, especially in the ImageBind embedding space.
5. **Exploring the influence of dimension reduction strategies**:
- In order to further optimize the classifier performance, the author also explores the effect of using dimension reduction methods such as PCA to process the embedded features. The results show that appropriately selecting the dimension after dimension reduction can effectively improve the classification accuracy and reduce the computational complexity.
### Summary
The core problem of this paper is how to use GMMs to replace the traditional Softmax classification layer in modern deep - learning frameworks, especially when using pre - trained embedded features (such as CLIP and ImageBind), whether better classification results can be achieved. The author not only proposes a new classifier structure, but also deeply analyzes the influence of different embedding spaces and dimension reduction strategies on the classification performance. Through a series of experimental verifications, it is proved that the newly proposed DGMMC classifier has significant advantages in some scenarios.
### Formula Summary
- **Posterior probability formula**:
\[
p(c|x)=\frac{p(x|c)p(c)}{\sum_{c' = 1}^{C}p(x|c')p(c')}
\]
- **Probability density function of GMM**:
\[
p(x|c)=\sum_{i = 1}^{k_c}\omega_{c,i}\phi(x|\mu_{c,i},\Sigma_{c,i})
\]
- **GMM under spherical covariance matrix**:
\[
p(c|x)=\frac{p(c)\sum_{i = 1}^{G}\omega_{c,i}\phi(x|\mu_{c,i},b_{c,i}I_D)}{\sum_{c' = 1}^{C}\left[p(c')\sum_{i = 1}^{G}\omega_{c',i}\phi(x|\mu_{c',i},b_{c',i}I_D)\right]}
\]
- **Parameter tensor definition**:
- \(P\in\mathbb{R}^C\) stores the prior probability \(p(c)\) of each category.
- \(W\in\mathbb{R}^{C\times G}\) captures the positive weights of all category GMMs.
- \(M\in\mathbb{R}^{C\times G\times D}\) collects all means.