Exploring the Head Effect in Live Streaming Platforms: A Two-Sided Market and Welfare Analysis

Yukun Zhang

2024-10-17

Abstract:This paper develops a theoretical framework to analyze live streaming platforms as two-sided markets connecting streamers and viewers, focusing on the "head effect" where a few top streamers attract most viewers due to strong network effects and platform policies like commission rates and traffic allocation algorithms. Using static and dynamic models, it examines how these factors lead to traffic concentration and winner-takes-all scenarios. The welfare implications are assessed, revealing that while such concentration may enhance consumer utility short-term, it can reduce content diversity and overall social welfare in the long run. The paper proposes policy interventions to adjust traffic allocation, promoting a more equitable distribution of viewers across streamers, and demonstrates through simulations that combining multiple policies can significantly reduce market concentration and enhance social welfare

Computers and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the "head effect" (head effect) in live - streaming platforms and its impact on the market and social welfare. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects:

1. **Causes of the head effect**:
- The paper explores the phenomenon that on live - streaming platforms, due to network effects and platform policies (such as commission rates, traffic distribution algorithms, etc.), a small number of top - level anchors attract most of the audience.
- Through static and dynamic models, it analyzes how these factors lead to traffic concentration and a winner - takes - all situation.

2. **Impact on social welfare**:
- Research shows that although this traffic concentration may enhance consumers' utility in the short term, in the long run, it will reduce content diversity and lower overall social welfare.
- Specific impacts include changes in consumer surplus (CS), producer surplus (PS), and platform profit (Π).

3. **Possibility of policy intervention**:
- The paper proposes some policy intervention measures to adjust traffic distribution and promote a more equitable distribution of the audience among different anchors.
- Through simulation experiments, it is proved that combining multiple policies can significantly reduce market concentration and improve social welfare.

### Mathematical formula representation

- **Audience utility function**:
\[
U_{ij}=\alpha_i q_i - p_i+\beta n_i+\epsilon_{ij}
\]
where:
- \(\alpha_i\) is the intrinsic attractiveness of anchor \(i\).
- \(q_i\) is the content quality provided by anchor \(i\).
- \(p_i\) is the price that audience \(j\) needs to pay to watch anchor \(i\).
- \(n_i\) is the number of audiences watching anchor \(i\), reflecting the network effect.
- \(\beta\) is the network effect parameter, and \(\beta > 0\) indicates a stronger network effect.
- \(\epsilon_{ij}\) is the random utility component, capturing the personal preference of audience \(j\) for anchor \(i\).

- **Anchor profit function**:
\[
V_i=(1 - \tau)R n_i - c(q_i)
\]
where:
- \(\tau\) is the platform's commission rate.
- \(R\) is the average revenue per audience.
- \(c(q_i)\) is the cost function for anchor \(i\) to produce high - quality content, which is assumed to be increasing and convex.

- **Audience selection probability**:
\[
P_i=\frac{\exp(\alpha_i q_i - p_i+\beta n_i)}{\sum_{k = 1}^N\exp(\alpha_k q_k - p_k+\beta n_k)}
\]

- **Dynamic change of the number of audiences**:
\[
\frac{d n_i(t)}{d t}=\gamma[M P_i(t)-n_i(t)]
\]

- **The number of audiences under steady - state conditions**:
\[
n_i^* = M P_i^*
\]

- **Content quality under steady - state conditions**:
\[
c'(q_i^*)=(1 - \tau)R M P_i^*(1 - P_i^*)\alpha_i
\]

### Summary

By establishing a theoretical framework, the paper analyzes the characteristics of live - streaming platforms as two - sided markets, and explores the formation mechanism of the head effect under the influence of network effects and platform policies and its impact on social welfare. The research results show that appropriate policy intervention can effectively alleviate the problem of market concentration and promote a more fair and diverse market environment.