A spatial hypergraph model where epidemic spread demonstrates clear higher-order effects

Omar Eldaghar,Yu Zhu,David Gleich
2024-10-16
Abstract:We demonstrate a spatial hypergraph model that allows us to vary the amount of higher-order structure in the generated hypergraph. Specifically, we can vary from a model that is a pure pairwise graph into a model that is almost a pure hypergraph. We use this spatial hypergraph model to study higher-order effects in epidemic spread. We use a susceptible-infected-recovered-susceptible (SIRS) epidemic model designed to mimic the spread of an airborne pathogen. We study three types of airborne effects that emulate airborne dilution effects. For the scenario of linear dilution, which roughly correspond to constant ventilation per person as required in many building codes, we see essentially no impact from introducing small hyperedges up to size 15 whereas we do see effects when the hyperedge set is dominated by large hyperedges. Specifically, we track the mean infections after the SIRS epidemic has run for awhile so it is in a "steady state" and find the mean is higher in the large hyperedge regime wheras it is unchanged from pairwise to small hyperedge regime.
Social and Information Networks,Physics and Society
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the importance of higher - order structure in epidemic spread, especially in scenarios based on group interactions. Specifically, the author hopes to understand whether significant different macroscopic effects will be produced when using the hypergraph model to simulate epidemic spread, compared with the traditional graph model that only considers pairwise relationships. ### Main research questions 1. **Influence of higher - order structure**: The author wants to clarify whether higher - order structures (such as interactions between large groups) have a significant impact on the macroscopic characteristics of the epidemic. They change the group structure in the network by introducing hyperedges of different scales and observe how this change affects the spread of the epidemic. 2. **Air - recycling effect**: In particular, the author focuses on the dilution effects in the airborne transmission path, such as linear dilution, which corresponds to the situation of a constant ventilation volume per person common in building ventilation standards. They hope to simulate the airborne transmission mechanism in the real world through these settings and evaluate its impact on the spread of the epidemic. ### Research methods To achieve the above goals, the author developed a spatial hypergraph model, which allows a smooth transition from a pure pairwise graph to an almost pure hypergraph. This model controls the size and number of hyperedges by adjusting the neighborhood radius parameter ε in the DBSCAN algorithm. Then, they use a discrete - time SIRS (Susceptible - Infected - Recovered - Susceptible) epidemic model to simulate disease transmission and analyze the impact of different types of air - dilution effects on the transmission results. ### Key findings 1. **Limited influence of small hyperedges**: When introducing smaller hyperedges (size ≤ 15), for the linear dilution case, the average number of infected people hardly changes, indicating that the influence of small - group interactions on epidemic spread is not obvious. 2. **Significant influence of large hyperedges**: When hyperedges are mainly composed of larger groups, the average number of infected people increases significantly. This means that the interactions between large groups have a significant impact on epidemic spread, especially when the air - dilution effect is weak. ### Conclusions This study shows that in some cases, higher - order structures (such as interactions between large groups) do have a significant impact on epidemic spread, not just simple pairwise interactions. This finding provides a basis for more detailed research in the future and helps to better understand and predict the epidemic spread behavior in complex environments. ### Formula summary - **Infection probability function**: \[ f(\beta, I, m)=\frac{1-(1 - \beta)^I}{g(m)} \] where \( \beta \) is the pairwise infection probability, \( I \) is the number of infected nodes in the hyperedge, \( m \) is the total number of nodes in the hyperedge, and \( g(m) \) is a normalization function, which can be linear \( g(m)=m \), square root \( g(m)=\sqrt{m} \), or square \( g(m)=m^2 \). - **Hyperedge formation function**: \[ \varepsilon_\alpha(d_{\text{max}}^v, k_v)= \begin{cases} \alpha\cdot\frac{d_{\text{max}}^v}{\sqrt{k_v}}, & 0\leq\alpha\leq1 \\ \frac{d_{\text{max}}^v}{\sqrt{k_v}}+(\alpha - 1)\cdot\left(d_{\text{max}}^v-\frac{d_{\text{max}}^v}{\sqrt{k_v}}\right), & 1 < \alpha\leq2 \end{cases} \]