Decline Now: A Combinatorial Model for Algorithmic Collective Action

Dorothee Sigg,Moritz Hardt,Celestine Mendler-Dünner

2024-10-16

Abstract:Drivers on food delivery platforms often run a loss on low-paying orders. In response, workers on DoorDash started a campaign, #DeclineNow, to purposefully decline orders below a certain pay threshold. For each declined order, the platform returns the request to other available drivers with slightly increased pay. While contributing to overall pay increase the implementation of the strategy comes with the risk of missing out on orders for each individual driver. In this work, we propose a first combinatorial model to study the strategic interaction between workers and the platform. Within our model, we formalize key quantities such as the average worker benefit of the strategy, the benefit of freeriding, as well as the benefit of participation. We extend our theoretical results with simulations. Our key insights show that the average worker gain of the strategy is always positive, while the benefit of participation is positive only for small degrees of labor oversupply. Beyond this point, the utility of participants decreases faster with increasing degree of oversupply, compared to the utility of non-participants. Our work highlights the significance of labor supply levels for the effectiveness of collective action on gig platforms. We suggest organizing in shifts as a means to reduce oversupply and empower collectives.

Computer Science and Game Theory,Human-Computer Interaction

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **How to increase the income of drivers on food - delivery platforms through collective action strategies, and study the feasibility and effectiveness of such strategies under different market conditions**.

Specifically, the paper focuses on the problem of low - paid orders faced by drivers on food - delivery platforms such as DoorDash. To address this issue, drivers launched the #DeclineNow campaign, which is to systematically refuse orders below a certain salary threshold. When a driver refuses an order, the platform will re - assign the order to other drivers and slightly increase the remuneration. This strategy aims to increase the overall income level of drivers through collective action, but it also brings the risk that individual drivers may miss orders.

### Main problem decomposition:
1. **Effectiveness of the strategy**: The paper proposes a combined model to study the strategic interaction between workers and the platform, especially to evaluate the impact of the #DeclineNow strategy on the overall income of drivers.
2. **Benefits of participants and the free - rider effect of non - participants**: It studies the respective benefits of participants (i.e., drivers who join the #DeclineNow campaign) and non - participants (i.e., drivers who do not join the campaign).
3. **Impact of market conditions**: It explores the impact of labor supply - and - demand relationships (such as labor surplus or shortage) on the effectiveness of collective action, especially whether the effectiveness of collective action will be weakened in the case of labor surplus.

### Formula summary:
- **Acceptance probability of participants**:
\[
\beta_t := q_t^{Z + 1}\quad\text{where}\quad Z=\frac{\tau - r}{\delta}
\]
Here, \(q_t\) is the proportion of participants among idle drivers at time step \(t\), \(\tau\) is the threshold wage, \(r\) is the base wage, and \(\delta\) is the amount of wage increase after each refusal.

- **Spillover effect of non - participants**:
\[
R_t:=\mathbb{E}[\text{pay increase}\mid\text{non - participant accepts order at time }t]=\delta\cdot\frac{q_t(Zq_t^{Z + 1}-(Z + 1)q_t^Z + 1)}{(1 - q_t)(1 - q_t^{Z + 1})}
\]

- **Utility of participants**:
\[
u_D(\alpha,\tau):=\frac{1}{\alpha N}(\tau - cm)n\mathbb{E}_t[\beta_tI_t]
\]

- **Utility of non - participants**:
\[
u_A(\alpha,\tau):=\frac{1}{(1-\alpha)N}(r - cm)n(1-\mathbb{E}_t[\beta_tI_t])+\frac{n}{(1-\alpha)N}R
\]

- **Average utility**:
\[
u(\alpha,\tau):=\alpha\cdot u_D(\alpha,\tau)+(1-\alpha)\cdot u_A(\alpha,\tau)
\]

- **Supply - and - demand conditions**:
\[
\text{Measure supply - and - demand ratio}\quad\text{deg}:=\frac{N}{b}
\]
where \(N\) is the total number of drivers and \(b\) is the number of time steps occupied by each order.

Through these formulas and models, the paper draws the following conclusions:
- **The income of the overall drivers always increases**, but this increase is limited in the case of labor surplus.
- **For a small - scale labor surplus, participating in collective action is still beneficial**, but in the case of a severe surplus, the benefits of participants may decrease more rapidly.
- **...**