Abstract:We address the fundamental problem of selection under uncertainty by modeling it from the perspective of Bayesian persuasion. In our model, a decision maker with imperfect information always selects the option with the highest expected value. We seek to achieve fairness among the options by revealing additional information to the decision maker and hence influencing its subsequent selection. To measure fairness, we adopt the notion of majorization, aiming at simultaneously approximately maximizing all symmetric, monotone, concave functions over the utilities of the options. As our main result, we design a novel information revelation policy that achieves a logarithmic-approximation to majorization in polynomial time. On the other hand, no policy, regardless of its running time, can achieve a constant-approximation to majorization. Our work is the first non-trivial majorization result in the Bayesian persuasion literature with multi-dimensional information sets.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to solve the problem of how to achieve fairness when making choices under uncertain conditions. Specifically, the author models from the perspective of Bayesian persuasion, aiming to influence the subsequent choices of decision - makers by revealing additional information to them, thereby achieving fairness among options.
### Problem Background
In many practical scenarios, such as recruitment decisions, college admissions, and advertising auctions, it is usually necessary to define an interpretable selection rule to optimize certain goals among agents (such as applicants or advertisers). The simplest and most common rule is to select the "best" or "most qualified" agent. However, this performance - based rule may lead to unfair results, especially when there is uncertainty in quality assessment. For example, an interviewer may have to make decisions based on limited information, which may be incomplete or biased.
### Core Problem of the Paper
The core problem of the paper is: **Under the condition of uncertainty about the quality of agents, how much additional information should be revealed to decision - makers so that they can still achieve fair results for agents while adhering to "selecting the best"?**
To answer this question, the author proposes the following model:
- **Each agent has an uncertain quality value**, and its true quality is known to a certain entity (which can be the agent itself or an intermediary).
- **This entity sends additional information to decision - makers** to reduce uncertainty and adjust the beliefs of decision - makers.
- **The decision - makers then select the optimal agent according to the updated posterior probability**.
### Definition of Fairness
To measure fairness, the author adopts the concept of **majorization**, that is, trying to simultaneously approximately maximize the values of all symmetric, monotonically increasing, and concave functions on agent utilities. This fairness measurement method covers multiple fairness goals, such as max - min fairness and Nash welfare.
### Main Contributions
1. **Proposes a new information - revelation strategy**, called "Single Mean Projections", which can achieve logarithmic - level approximate majorization within polynomial time.
2. **Proves that no strategy can achieve constant - level approximate majorization**, indicating the difficulty of the problem.
3. **Shows how to reduce the problem to a network - flow problem**, thereby using classical network - flow solutions to design effective information - revelation strategies.
### Conclusion
This paper provides the first non - trivial majorization result for the Bayesian persuasion problem under multi - dimensional information sets, solving the key problem of how to achieve fair selection through information revelation under uncertain conditions. This work is not only of great theoretical significance but also provides new ideas and tools for fairness design in practical applications.
### Related Formulas
In the paper, the mathematical concepts and formulas involved include:
- **Majorization**:
\[
\sum_{i = 1}^k U_i(\Omega) \geq \frac{1}{\alpha} \sum_{i = 1}^k U_i(\Omega')
\]
where \(\alpha \geq 1\), and \(U_i(\Omega)\) represents the expected utility of agent \(i\) under strategy \(\Omega\).
- **Posterior Mean**:
\[
\mu_i(\sigma)=E[D_i(\sigma)]
\]
- **Expected Utility**:
\[
U_i(\Omega)=E_{\omega \sim \Omega}\left[\sum_{\sigma \in \Gamma} q_\omega(\sigma)\cdot w_i(\sigma)\cdot \mu_i(\sigma)\right]
\]
These formulas ensure the rigor and accuracy of the theoretical analysis and results in the paper.