Abstract:While the activations of neurons in deep neural networks usually do not have a simple human-understandable interpretation, sparse autoencoders (SAEs) can be used to transform these activations into a higher-dimensional latent space which may be more easily interpretable. However, these SAEs can have millions of distinct latent features, making it infeasible for humans to manually interpret each one. In this work, we build an open-source automated pipeline to generate and evaluate natural language explanations for SAE features using LLMs. We test our framework on SAEs of varying sizes, activation functions, and losses, trained on two different open-weight LLMs. We introduce five new techniques to score the quality of explanations that are cheaper to run than the previous state of the art. One of these techniques, intervention scoring, evaluates the interpretability of the effects of intervening on a feature, which we find explains features that are not recalled by existing methods. We propose guidelines for generating better explanations that remain valid for a broader set of activating contexts, and discuss pitfalls with existing scoring techniques. We use our explanations to measure the semantic similarity of independently trained SAEs, and find that SAEs trained on nearby layers of the residual stream are highly similar. Our large-scale analysis confirms that SAE latents are indeed much more interpretable than neurons, even when neurons are sparsified using top-$k$ postprocessing. Our code is available at <a class="link-external link-https" href="https://github.com/EleutherAI/sae-auto-interp" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>, and our explanations are available at <a class="link-external link-https" href="https://huggingface.co/datasets/EleutherAI/auto_interp_explanations" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>.

Can sparse autoencoders make sense of latent representations?

Learning interpretable latent autoencoder representations with annotations of feature sets

Disentangling Dense Embeddings with Sparse Autoencoders

Learning biologically relevant features in a pathology foundation model using sparse autoencoders

Decomposing The Dark Matter of Sparse Autoencoders

A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoders

Interpreting Attention Layer Outputs with Sparse Autoencoders

Compute Optimal Inference and Provable Amortisation Gap in Sparse Autoencoders

Biological network-inspired interpretable variational autoencoder

Variational autoencoders learn transferrable representations of metabolomics data

Encoding Domain Information with Sparse Priors for Inferring Explainable Latent Variables

Analyzing (In)Abilities of SAEs via Formal Languages

Evaluating Open-Source Sparse Autoencoders on Disentangling Factual Knowledge in GPT-2 Small

Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Models

Using VAEs to Learn Latent Variables: Observations on Applications in cryo-EM

Applying sparse autoencoders to unlearn knowledge in language models

scVAE: variational auto-encoders for single-cell gene expression data

Can sparse autoencoders be used to decompose and interpret steering vectors?

Interpretable factor models of single-cell RNA-seq via variational autoencoders

Interpretability as Compression: Reconsidering SAE Explanations of Neural Activations with MDL-SAEs

Supervising the Decoder of Variational Autoencoders to Improve Scientific Utility