The Geometry of Generalized Lame Equation, III: One-to-one of the Riemann-Hilbert Correspondence
Zhijie Chen,Ting-Jung Kuo,Chang-Shou Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4310/pamq.2021.v17.n5.a2
2021-01-01
Pure and Applied Mathematics Quarterly
Abstract:In this paper, the third in a series, we continue to study the generalized Lame equation H(n(0), n(1), n(2), n(3); B) with the Darboux-Treibich-Verdier potential y ''(z) = [Sigma(3)(k=0)nk (n(k) + 1) P(z +omega(k)/2 vertical bar + B] y(z), nk is an element of Z >= 0 and a related linear ODE with additional singularities +/- p from the monodromy aspect. We establish the uniqueness of these ODEs with respect to the global monodromy data. Surprisingly, our result shows that the Riemann-Hilbert correspondence from the set {H(n(0), n(1), n(2), n(3); B)vertical bar B is an element of C} boolean OR {H(n(0) + 2, n(1), n(2), n(3); B)vertical bar B is an element of C} to the set of group representations rho : pi(1)(E-tau) -> SL(2, C) is one-to-one. We emphasize that this result is not trivial at all. There is an example that for tau = 1/2 + i root 3/2, there are B-1, B-2 such that the monodromy representations of H(1, 0, 0, 0; B-1) and H(4, 0, 0, 0; B-2) are the same, namely the Riemann-Hilbert correspondence from the set {H(n(0), n(1), n(2), n(3); B)vertical bar B is an element of C} boolean OR {H(n(0) + 3, n(1), n(2), n(3); B)vertical bar B is an element of C} to the set of group representations is not necessarily one-to-one. This example shows that our result is completely different from the classical one concerning linear ODEs defined on CP1 with finite singularities.