Abstract:Within batch reinforcement learning, safe policy improvement (SPI) seeks to ensure that the learnt policy performs at least as well as the behavior policy that generated the dataset. The core challenge in SPI is seeking improvements while balancing risk when many state-action pairs may be infrequently visited. In this work, we introduce Decision Points RL (DPRL), an algorithm that restricts the set of state-action pairs (or regions for continuous states) considered for improvement. DPRL ensures high-confidence improvement in densely visited states (i.e. decision points) while still utilizing data from sparsely visited states. By appropriately limiting where and how we may deviate from the behavior policy, we achieve tighter bounds than prior work; specifically, our data-dependent bounds do not scale with the size of the state and action spaces. In addition to the analysis, we demonstrate that DPRL is both safe and performant on synthetic and real datasets.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to solve the problem of Safe Policy Improvement (SPI) in Batch Reinforcement Learning (Batch RL). Specifically, the goal of the research is to achieve performance improvement on the premise of ensuring that the performance of the learned policy is at least no worse than that of the behavior policy that generates the data set. The main challenge lies in how to seek improvement while balancing risks, especially in cases where many state - action pairs may be rarely visited. ### Main Problems 1. **Ensuring Safety**: The learned policy must ensure that it is not worse than the behavior policy. 2. **Improvement under Limited Exploration**: When certain state - action pairs in the data set rarely occur, how to effectively identify areas for improvement. 3. **Without Behavior Policy Information**: Still be able to safely improve the policy without knowing the specific form of the behavior policy. ### Solution Overview To solve the above problems, the author introduced Decision Points Reinforcement Learning (DPRL), a method to ensure high - confidence improvement by restricting the state - action pairs for improvement. The core ideas of DPRL are: - **Defining Decision Points**: Only improve on those state - action pairs that frequently appear in the data set (i.e., "decision points"), and the number of visits to these pairs needs to be greater than or equal to a threshold \( N \). - **Recursive Behavior Policy**: For those states lacking high - confidence improvement, continue to follow the current behavior policy. - **No Need for Behavior Policy Knowledge**: DPRL does not need to know the specific form of the behavior policy in advance, thus being applicable to more scenarios in practical applications. ### Theoretical Contributions - **Tighter Theoretical Bounds**: Compared with existing algorithms, DPRL provides tighter theoretical guarantees, and its bounds depend on the safety threshold parameter \( N \), rather than the size of the state and action spaces. - **Applicability to Discrete and Continuous State Spaces**: DPRL is applicable not only to discrete state spaces but also to continuous state spaces, and can provide theoretical guarantees in both cases. ### Experimental Verification The author verified the effectiveness of DPRL through synthetic data sets and real - world medical data sets, proving that it can better balance the improvement effect while maintaining safety. ### Formula Summary - **Decision Point Set**: \[ A_{\text{DP}}^s=\{a \in A: n(s, a) \geq N \land \hat{Q}_{\pi_b}(s, a) \geq \hat{V}_{\pi_b}(s)\} \] \[ S_{\text{DP}}=\{s \in S: A_{\text{DP}}^s \neq \emptyset\} \] - **Discrete Case of Safe Improvement Bound**: \[ \rho(\pi_{\text{DP}})-\rho(\pi_b) \geq-\frac{V_{\max}}{1 - \gamma} \cdot \frac{1}{N} \log \frac{C(N)}{\delta} \] where \( C(N)=\sum_{s \in S} \sum_{a \in A} I[n(s, a) \geq N] \). - **Continuous Case of Safe Improvement Bound**: \[ \rho(\pi_{\text{DP}})-\rho(\pi_b) \geq-\frac{V_{\max}}{1 - \gamma} \cdot\left(\frac{r}{2N} \log \frac{M(r, N)}{\delta}-3\epsilon_r\right) \] where \( M(r, N) \) is the number of balls required to cover the state - action pairs that meet the conditions, and \( \epsilon_r \) is the maximum error of the Q - value estimate. In this way, DPRL can

Decision-Point Guided Safe Policy Improvement

Safe Reinforcement Learning Using Finite-Horizon Gradient-based Estimation

Shielded Planning Guided Data-Efficient and Safe Reinforcement Learning

Probabilistic Constraint for Safety-Critical Reinforcement Learning

Safe Reinforcement Learning in Constrained Markov Decision Processes

Safe Policy Exploration Improvement via Subgoals

Enhancing Efficiency of Safe Reinforcement Learning via Sample Manipulation

Safeguarded Progress in Reinforcement Learning: Safe Bayesian Exploration for Control Policy Synthesis

Learn With Imagination: Safe Set Guided State-wise Constrained Policy Optimization

Iterative Reachability Estimation for Safe Reinforcement Learning

Safe Deep Policy Adaptation

Adaptive Primal-Dual Method for Safe Reinforcement Learning

Safe Reinforcement Learning for Constrained Markov Decision Processes with Stochastic Stopping Time

Provable Safe Reinforcement Learning with Binary Feedback

Solving Reach-Avoid-Stay Problems Using Deep Deterministic Policy Gradients

SCPO: Safe Reinforcement Learning with Safety Critic Policy Optimization

Benchmarking Safe Exploration in Deep Reinforcement Learning

The Ladder in Chaos: A Simple and Effective Improvement to General DRL Algorithms by Policy Path Trimming and Boosting

Implicit Safe Set Algorithm for Provably Safe Reinforcement Learning

State-Wise Safe Reinforcement Learning With Pixel Observations

Safe Policy Optimization with Local Generalized Linear Function Approximations.