Abstract:Using only 34 published tables, we reconstruct five variables (census block, sex, age, race, and ethnicity) in the confidential 2010 Census person records. Using the 38-bin age variable tabulated at the census block level, at most 20.1% of reconstructed records can differ from their confidential source on even a single value for these five variables. Using only published data, an attacker can verify that all records in 70% of all census blocks (97 million people) are perfectly reconstructed. The tabular publications in Summary File 1 thus have prohibited disclosure risk similar to the unreleased confidential microdata. Reidentification studies confirm that an attacker can, within blocks with perfect reconstruction accuracy, correctly infer the actual census response on race and ethnicity for 3.4 million vulnerable population uniques (persons with nonmodal characteristics) with 95% accuracy, the same precision as the confidential data achieve and far greater than statistical baselines. The flaw in the 2010 Census framework was the assumption that aggregation prevented accurate microdata reconstruction, justifying weaker disclosure limitation methods than were applied to 2010 Census public microdata. The framework used for 2020 Census publications defends against attacks that are based on reconstruction, as we also demonstrate here. Finally, we show that alternatives to the 2020 Census Disclosure Avoidance System with similar accuracy (enhanced swapping) also fail to protect confidentiality, and those that partially defend against reconstruction attacks (incomplete suppression implementations) destroy the primary statutory use case: data for redistricting all legislatures in the country in compliance with the 1965 Voting Rights Act.

The 2020 United States Decennial Census Is More Private Than You (Might) Think

Differential Privacy in the 2020 Decennial Census and the Implications for Available Data Products

Escalation of Commitment: A Case Study of the United States Census Bureau Efforts to Implement Differential Privacy for the 2020 Decennial Census

Differential Privacy Protections in 2020 U.S. Decennial Census Data Do Not Impede Measurement of Racial and Ethnic Disparities

Impacts of Differential Privacy on Fostering more Racially and Ethnically Diverse Elementary Schools

Confidentiality Protection in the 2020 US Census of Population and Housing

Evaluating bias and noise induced by the U.S. Census Bureau's privacy protection methods

Comment: The Essential Role of Policy Evaluation for the 2020 Census Disclosure Avoidance System

The Impact of the U.S. Census Disclosure Avoidance System on Redistricting and Voting Rights Analysis

Noisy Measurements Are Important, the Design of Census Products Is Much More Important

An In-Depth Examination of Requirements for Disclosure Risk Assessment

When Privacy Protection Goes Wrong: How and Why the 2020 Census Confidentiality Program Failed

Assessing Statistical Disclosure Risk for Differentially Private, Hierarchical Count Data, with Application to the 2020 U.S. Decennial Census

Making Differential Privacy Work for Census Data Users

Impacts of Census Differential Privacy for Small-Area Disease Mapping to Monitor Health Inequities

Census TopDown: The Impacts of Differential Privacy on Redistricting

Quantifying Privacy Risks of Public Statistics to Residents of Subsidized Housing

Understanding and Mitigating the Impacts of Differentially Private Census Data on State Level Redistricting

The 2010 Census Confidentiality Protections Failed, Here's How and Why

Decision Making with Differential Privacy under a Fairness Lens

The Complexities of Differential Privacy for Survey Data