Abstract:One key consequence of the information revolution is a significant increase and a contamination of our information supply. The practice of fact checking won't suffice to eliminate the biases in text data we observe, as the degree of factuality alone does not determine whether biases exist in the spectrum of opinions visible to us. To better understand controversial issues, one needs to view them from a diverse yet comprehensive set of perspectives. For example, there are many ways to respond to a claim such as "animals should have lawful rights", and these responses form a spectrum of perspectives, each with a stance relative to this claim and, ideally, with evidence supporting it. Inherently, this is a natural language understanding task, and we propose to address it as such. Specifically, we propose the task of substantiated perspective discovery where, given a claim, a system is expected to discover a diverse set of well-corroborated perspectives that take a stance with respect to the claim. Each perspective should be substantiated by evidence paragraphs which summarize pertinent results and facts. We construct PERSPECTRUM, a dataset of claims, perspectives and evidence, making use of online debate websites to create the initial data collection, and augmenting it using search engines in order to expand and diversify our dataset. We use crowd-sourcing to filter out noise and ensure high-quality data. Our dataset contains 1k claims, accompanied with pools of 10k and 8k perspective sentences and evidence paragraphs, respectively. We provide a thorough analysis of the dataset to highlight key underlying language understanding challenges, and show that human baselines across multiple subtasks far outperform ma-chine baselines built upon state-of-the-art NLP techniques. This poses a challenge and opportunity for the NLP community to address.

A Benchmark for Cross-Domain Argumentative Stance Classification on Social Media

Same Side Stance Classification Task: Facilitating Argument Stance Classification by Fine-tuning a BERT Model

Improved Target-specific Stance Detection on Social Media Platforms by Delving into Conversation Threads

Robust Stance Detection: Understanding Public Perceptions in Social Media

Detecting Stance in Media on Global Warming

Which Side Are You On? A Multi-task Dataset for End-to-End Argument Summarisation and Evaluation

Argumentative Stance Prediction: An Exploratory Study on Multimodality and Few-Shot Learning

Advancing Annotation of Stance in Social Media Posts: A Comparative Analysis of Large Language Models and Crowd Sourcing

ORCHID: A Chinese Debate Corpus for Target-Independent Stance Detection and Argumentative Dialogue Summarization

A Survey of Stance Detection on Social Media: New Directions and Perspectives

Understanding and Detecting Supporting Arguments of Diverse Types

A Challenge Dataset and Effective Models for Conversational Stance Detection

Differential Bias: On the Perceptibility of Stance Imbalance in Argumentation

Stance Prediction for Contemporary Issues: Data and Experiments

Seeing Things from a Different Angle: Discovering Diverse Perspectives about Claims

Recognizing Stances in Mandarin Social Ideological Debates with Text and Acoustic Features

Stance Reasoner: Zero-Shot Stance Detection on Social Media with Explicit Reasoning

Argue with Me Tersely: Towards Sentence-Level Counter-Argument Generation

Can We Identify Stance Without Target Arguments? A Study for Rumour Stance Classification

Overview of NLPCC Shared Task 4: Stance Detection in Chinese Microblogs

Stance Detection on Social Media with Background Knowledge