In-ice Askaryan Emission from Air Showers: Implications for Radio Neutrino Detectors

Alan Coleman,Christian Glaser,Ryan Rice-Smith,Steven Barwick,Dave Besson
2024-10-11
Abstract:One of the most promising techniques for detecting ultra-high energy neutrinos involves the use of radio antennas to observe the 10-1000 MHz radiation generated by the showers that neutrinos induce in large volumes of ice. The expected neutrino detection rates of one neutrino or less per detector station per 10 years make the characterization of backgrounds a priority. The largest natural background comes from ultra-high energy cosmic rays which are orders of magnitude more abundant than neutrinos. Particularly crucial is the understanding of geometries in which substantial energy of the cosmic-ray-induced air shower is deposited in the ice giving rise to a compact in-ice shower close to the ice surface. We calculated the radio emission of air-shower cores using the novel CORSIKA 8 code and found it to be similar to the predictions for neutrino-induced showers. For the first time, we calculated the detection rates for O(100m) deep antennas yielding 10-100 detections per year and detector station, which makes this a useful calibration source as these downward-going signals can be differentiated from neutrino-induced showers based on the signal arrival direction. However, the presence of reflection layers in the ice confuses the arrival directions, which makes this a potentially important background. We review the existing information on reflecting layers in the South Pole glacier and, for the first time, quantify the corresponding rate of reflected air-shower signals for the proposed IceCube-Gen2 radio array and discuss mitigation strategies. The reflectivity of the layers is the dominant uncertainty resulting in rate predictions of much less than one detection to several detections per year for IceCube-Gen2 if not mitigated.
High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena,Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the paper attempts to solve The paper "Askaryan Radiation from Atmospheric Showers in Ice: Implications for Radio Neutrino Detectors" aims to solve the following key problems: 1. **Characterization of background signals**: - **Main sources of background**: Secondary particles produced by ultra - high - energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) form atmospheric showers in the atmosphere. These showers may continue to develop when reaching the ground and deposit a large amount of energy in the ice, thus producing signals similar to those produced by neutrino interactions. - **Influence of the reflector layer**: The reflector layer in the Antarctic ice can reflect signals back upwards, making these signals appear to be emitted from deep ice, which is similar to neutrino signals and increases the complexity of background signals. 2. **Quantification of detection rates**: - **Direct signal path**: The number of air - shower core signals detected per station per year in an antenna array at a depth of 100 - 200 meters was calculated, and it is expected to be 10 - 100 times. - **Reflected signal path**: For the first time, the background signal detection rate caused by the reflector layer was quantified, and its impact on the IceCube - Gen2 radio array was discussed. 3. **Application of calibration sources**: - **Calibration signal**: The Askaryan radiation produced by the air - shower core can be used as a calibration signal to verify the effectiveness of trigger efficiency, signal identification, and reconstruction algorithms. - **Independent measurement**: Detecting radio emissions in the air through a shallow - layer antenna assembly can provide independent measurement results to verify the direction and energy deposition of air showers. 4. **Characteristics of the reflector layer**: - **Sources of the reflector layer**: Four main sources of the reflector layer in the Antarctic ice were summarized, including the denser layer formed by summer snowmelt, the sulfate layer deposited by volcanic eruptions, the realignment of ice crystal directions, and the sea - salt fluctuations brought by the wind. - **Measurement of reflectivity**: Existing measurement data of the reflectivity of the reflector layer were reviewed, and it was pointed out that the current measurement has large uncertainties and further research is needed to better constrain the characteristics of the reflector layer. ### Main research contents 1. **Overview of the reflector layer**: - The causes of the reflector layer and existing measurement data were introduced, emphasizing the important influence of the reflector layer on background signals. 2. **Calculation of radio emissions from air - shower cores in ice**: - The CORSIKA 8 code was used to simulate the radio emissions in ice of vertical air showers with different energies, and the time - domain waveforms and frequency spectra of the signals were analyzed. - The radio emissions of air - shower cores and neutrino - induced showers in ice were compared, and it was found that they are very similar in the time - domain waveform but different in the frequency domain. 3. **Calculation of air - shower core detection rates**: - The deposited energy spectrum was calculated according to the measured cosmic - ray energy spectrum and Xmax distribution. - NuRadioMC was used to simulate the effective area under different - depth reflector layers, and it was combined with the deposited energy spectrum to calculate the air - shower core detection rate. 4. **Mitigation strategies for background signals**: - How to reduce the background signals caused by the reflector layer by improving the measurement and modeling of ice - layer characteristics was discussed. ### Conclusion This paper, through detailed simulation and analysis of radio emissions from air - shower cores in ice, quantified for the first time the background signal detection rate caused by the reflector layer and proposed corresponding mitigation strategies. These research results are of great significance for improving the sensitivity and accuracy of neutrino detectors.