When does additional information lead to longer travel time in multi-origin-destination networks?

Xujin Chen,Xiaodong Hu,Xinqi Jing,Zhongzheng Tang

2024-10-11

Abstract:The Informational Braess' Paradox (IBP) illustrates a counterintuitive scenario where revelation of additional roadway segments to some self-interested travelers leads to increased travel times for these individuals. IBP extends the original Braess' paradox by relaxing the assumption that all travelers have identical and complete information about the network. In this paper, we study the conditions under which IBP does not occur in networks with non-atomic selfish travelers and multiple origin-destination pairs. Our results completely characterize the network topologies immune to IBP, thus resolving an open question proposed by Acemoglu et al.

Computer Science and Game Theory

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problem does this paper attempt to solve?

This paper aims to study and fully characterize the network topologies in which information expansion will not lead to the Informational Braess' Paradox (IBP) in multi - origin - destination (multi - OD) networks. Specifically:

1. **Background and Motivation**:
- **Braess' Paradox (BP)**: The classic Braess' Paradox shows that adding a new road in a traffic network sometimes results in an increase in the travel time for all travelers. This is because each traveler chooses a path based on their rational decision, ultimately leading to a decline in overall efficiency.
- **Informational Braess' Paradox (IBP)**: The Informational Braess' Paradox is an extension of the Braess' Paradox. It takes into account the situation of information asymmetry, that is, after some travelers obtain additional road information, their travel time instead increases.

2. **Research Questions**:
- **Problem Description**: The paper explores the conditions under which information expansion will not trigger IBP in the case of non - atomic selfish travelers and multiple origin - destination pairs. Here, "non - atomic" means that the impact of each traveler on the total flow is negligible.
- **Specific Objectives**: The goal of the paper is to fully characterize the undirected network topologies that are not affected by IBP, thus solving an open problem proposed by Acemoglu et al.

3. **Main Contributions**:
- **Necessary and Sufficient Conditions**: The authors establish the necessary and sufficient conditions for the non - occurrence of IBP in undirected networks with multiple OD pairs. These conditions include two aspects:
- **SLI Condition**: Each sub - network \( G_i \) must be a Series of Linearly Independent (SLI) network.
- **Common Block Condition**: For any distinct \( i, j \), if \( E(G_i)\cap E(G_j)\neq\emptyset \), then the graph induced by \( E(G_i)\cap E(G_j) \) must contain all common blocks, and each common block is either a coincident block or a cycle.

4. **Theoretical Significance**:
- **Solving Open Problems**: By fully characterizing the network topologies not affected by IBP, the paper solves the open problem proposed by Acemoglu et al.
- **Guiding Network Design**: These results are helpful in improving traffic efficiency in network design and avoiding counter - intuitive phenomena caused by information expansion.

In summary, the main purpose of this paper is to find, through strict mathematical analysis, the conditions under which information expansion will not lead to the Informational Braess' Paradox in multi - origin - destination networks, thereby providing theoretical support for network design.