Abstract:We apply a Bayesian agent-based framework inspired by QBism to iterations of two quantum games, the CHSH game and the quantum prisoners' dilemma. In each two-player game, players hold beliefs about an amount of shared entanglement and about the actions or beliefs of the other player. Each takes actions which maximize their expected utility and revises their beliefs with the classical Bayes rule between rounds. We simulate iterated play to see if and how players can learn about the presence of shared entanglement and to explore how their performance, their beliefs, and the game's structure interrelate. In the CHSH game, we find that players can learn that entanglement is present and use this to achieve quantum advantage. We find that they can only do so if they also believe the other player will act correctly to exploit the entanglement. In the case of low or zero entanglement in the CHSH game, the players cannot achieve quantum advantage, even in the case where they believe the entanglement is higher than it is. For the prisoners dilemma, we show that assuming 1-fold rational players (rational players who believe the other player is also rational) reduces the quantum extension [Eisert, Wilkens, and Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3077 (1999)] of the prisoners dilemma to a game with only two strategies, one of which (defect) is dominant for low entanglement, and the other (the quantum strategy Q) is dominant for high entanglement. For intermediate entanglement, neither strategy is dominant. We again show that players can learn entanglement in iterated play. We also show that strong belief in entanglement causes optimal play even in the absence of entanglement -- showing that belief in entanglement is acting as a proxy for the players trusting each other. Our work points to possible future applications in resource detection and quantum algorithm design.

Optimal Strategies for Winning Certain Coset-Guessing Quantum Games

Optimal Guessing Strategies in a Quantum Card Game

Winning a CHSH Game without Entangled Particles in a Finite Number of Biased Rounds: How Much Luck Is Needed?

Shared entanglement for three-party causal order guessing game

Four-Qubit CHSH Games

Computing the quantum guesswork: a quadratic assignment problem

Rounding near-optimal quantum strategies for nonlocal games to strategies using maximally entangled states

Identifying the value of a random variable unambiguously: Quantum versus classical approaches

Perfect quantum strategies with small input cardinality

Optimal, and approximately optimal, quantum strategies for $\mathrm{XOR}^{*}$ and $\mathrm{FFL}$ games

Minimum Guesswork Discrimination Between Quantum States

Quantum Bayesian Games

Constructing quantum games from symmetric non-factorizable joint probabilities

A quantum cloning game with applications to quantum position verification

Surpassing the Classical Limit in Magic Square Game with Distant Quantum Dots Coupled to Optical Cavities

Quantum Strategy Without Entanglement

Secret Information Sharing using Multipartite Entanglement in Monty Hall Game

Two new non-equivalent three-qubit CHSH games

Non-Hermitian CHSH * game with a single trapped-ion qubit

A Three-Player Coherent State Embezzlement Game

Optimal quantum source coding with quantum information at the encoder and decoder